已解决-Verbal 分册 No. 64

mongmong

可以的 that是部分复制且要有改动
部分复制the rate of addition的the rate
of loss 是改动部分

-- by 会员 universer (2011/5/25 20:42:29)

太谢谢啦~

清绿地

A) those of loss rise
'those' has no reference
(B) it rises for loss
'it' has no reference
(C) those of losses rise
'those' has no reference
(D) the rate of loss rises
parallel and correct
(E) there are rises for the rate of loss
'there are rises' is wordy and redundant

mongmong

A) those of loss rise
'those' has no reference
(B) it rises for loss
'it' has no reference
(C) those of losses rise
'those' has no reference
(D) the rate of loss rises
parallel and correct
(E) there are rises for the rate of loss
'there are rises' is wordy and redundant

-- by 会员 清绿地 (2011/8/8 0:10:03)

谢谢，但您木有回答我的问题哦

mongmong

这题和OG 85的疑问是一样的：

85. Salt deposits and moisture threaten to destroy the Mohenjo-Daro excavation in Pakistan, the site of an  ancient civilization "that ?ourished at thesame time as the civilizations" in the Nile Delta and the river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates.

(A) that ?urished at the sametime as the civilizations
(B) that had ?ourished at the sametime as had the civilizations
(C) that ?ourished at the sametime those had
(D) ?ourishing at thesame time as those did
(E) ?ourishing at thesame time as those were

对CDE的解释都提到 Plural pronoun "those" cannot refer to the singular "civilization" and thus lacks a referent. 那么倘若我们比较的是A 和B两个civilization, 而非现在的A和B, C, D......., 然后把those 改称that就可以吗？用that refer to 前一个civilization?

AlohaDJ

回13楼：是的。
回1楼：lz的疑问在于，第二个比较对象是否可以用that指代第一个单数比较对象，在比较结构中（如as..as.., more than, exceed, etc.）,可以的。但原句是while表示对比引导的从句，感觉重复原名词rate更好。个人感觉。

mongmong

回13楼：是的。
回1楼：lz的疑问在于，第二个比较对象是否可以用that指代第一个单数比较对象，在比较结构中（如as..as.., more than, exceed, etc.）,可以的。但原句是while表示对比引导的从句，感觉重复原名词rate更好。个人感觉。

-- by 会员 AlohaDJ (2011/8/8 22:06:42)

13楼和1楼都是我哈~~谢谢回复~~


可是第一个比较对象和第二个比较对象不是一样东西哎，可以用that (which is the second civilization) refer to the first civilization?

AlohaDJ

呵呵知道都是mm一个人了。。

that/those这种指代是所谓的“核心指代”，只是指代前面出现的核心词，而不是像it/they全部指代（即指代包括修饰部分一起），所以that后面加自己的限定成分用以和前面的指代对象比较，这样的话，前面和后面的东西当然不一样了，也正是因为有差别才比较呢。不知这是不是lz的疑问所在。

aeoluseros

用that代替the rate木有歧义，支持可用that…
--edited by aeo 8/10 8:50

mongmong

呵呵知道都是mm一个人了。。

that/those这种指代是所谓的“核心指代”，只是指代前面出现的核心词，而不是像it/they全部指代（即指代包括修饰部分一起），所以that后面加自己的限定成分用以和前面的指代对象比较，这样的话，前面和后面的东西当然不一样了，也正是因为有差别才比较呢。不知这是不是lz的疑问所在。

-- by 会员 AlohaDJ (2011/8/8 22:23:21)

谢谢！！！！是的是的，这是我的疑问。


谢谢！

mongmong

你是说 that of loss rises可用吧？