【求助】OG12 106 112 126 , 代词指代？ ---------续问

kingarthur00

up

kingarthur00

求nn解答！

kingarthur00

OG12-126.
The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological
responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
OG C:this construction is less successful at clarifying the chain of events becuase creating seems to refer back to lying
Q2:C的解释说creating seems to refer back to lying。我认为，按照与语法习惯creating应该修饰emotional reactions啊！
请问，根据什么判断creating能指代lying？
继续追问！
up！！！

kingarthur00

坚持！！！

kingarthur00

继续顶！

mongmong

OG12-112
As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with
such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if
it were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally
blind if an adult.
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision
would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would
be rated about 20/500.
OG,: it begins with a subordinate clause , whose subject is a baby; the subject of the main clause, it appears to refer back to baby.
Q1:“the subject of the main clause, it appears to refer back to baby.”这句话是根据什么判断的呢？“主句主语优先指代从句主语”或是“对称”[说不出来，就是觉得it 非指代a baby不可]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OG12-126.
The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological
responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
OG C:this construction is less successful at clarifying the chain of events becuase creating seems to refer back to lying
Q2:这句解释是根据什么判断creating能指代lying？
[不知道，我觉得不能准确知道creating指代什么，可以是lying, 可以使is based on?也许这就是问题，就连OG上说if used as a participial, creating would have to be preceded by a comma，我也不能确定用, creating就好吗？你也回答回答我的问题撒]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OG12-106  
Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for
communicating with a large, public audience.
(A) Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, but which is
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
(D) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a substitute for the telephone, which has become
(E) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, other than what it is,
OG C:it in the second clause clearly refer to the radio
Q3：it没有指代主语，为什么还清晰？   而且按照平行原则，    “；instead，it...”    这里的it指代前句的主语Marconi多完美啊
[这里好像你已经明白了哈]

PS:偶search了cd这几题的所有帖子，没找到满意答案，但代词指代又是重要考点，所以问个究竟！期待大N们启迪，造福后人！

-- by 会员 kingarthur00 (2011/4/14 9:11:51)

mongmong

个人感觉individual是人  that只能指代物  所以that不行 有问题还请多多指教  呵呵

-- by 会员 yajingzhang (2011/5/21 0:00:20)

同意

mongmong

再补充一道

113.
Because there are provisions of the new maritime
code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis
for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea
areas, they have already stimulated international
disputes over uninhabited islands.
(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime
code that provide that even tiny islets can be the
basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of
large sea areas, they have already stimulated
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that
even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the
fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has
already stimulated
(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the
fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under
provisions of the new maritime code, already
stimulating
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for
claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea
areas under provisions of the new maritime
code, this has already stimulated
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for
claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea
areas under provisions of the new maritime
code, which is already stimulating
OG A: in the predicate nominative instead of the subject position, provisions is not an obvious referent for the pronoun they.  
Q4:该解释什么意思？ 因为there be倒装，所以they不好指代provisions[因为provisions在述语部分的主(A word in the nominative case that completes a copulative verb, such as son in the sentence Charlie is my son）不在主语，因而they 不能够明确地指到provisions]


另外，给你推荐个字典，google dictionary，这样就会知道predicate nominative不是倒装

-- by 会员 kingarthur00 (2011/4/14 9:22:43)

kingarthur00

OG12-112
As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with
such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if
it were an adult with such vision.
(B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult.
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally
blind if an adult.
(D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision
would be deemed legally blind.
(E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would
be rated about 20/500.
OG,: it begins with a subordinate clause , whose subject is a baby; the subject of the main clause, it appears to refer back to baby.
Q1:“the subject of the main clause, it appears to refer back to baby.”这句话是根据什么判断的呢？“主句主语优先指代从句主语”或是“对称”[说不出来，就是觉得it 非指代a baby不可]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OG12-126.
The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological
responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
OG C:this construction is less successful at clarifying the chain of events becuase creating seems to refer back to lying
Q2:这句解释是根据什么判断creating能指代lying？
[不知道，我觉得不能准确知道creating指代什么，可以是lying, 可以使is based on?也许这就是问题，就连OG上说if used as a participial, creating would have to be preceded by a comma，我也不能确定用, creating就好吗？你也回答回答我的问题撒]-----------用，creating没有A好，因为“，creating”是前面整句话的伴随结果状语，但是没有明确creating的动作是reactions发出的。因此因果逻辑没有A清晰
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OG12-106  
Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is precisely the opposite, a tool for
communicating with a large, public audience.
(A) Marconi’s conception of the radio was as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation; instead, it is
(B) Marconi conceived of the radio as a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, but which is
(C) Marconi conceived of the radio as a tool for private conversation that could substitute for the telephone; instead, it has become
(D) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a tool for private conversation, a substitute for the telephone, which has become
(E) Marconi conceived of the radio to be a substitute for the telephone, a tool for private conversation, other than what it is,
OG C:it in the second clause clearly refer to the radio
Q3：it没有指代主语，为什么还清晰？   而且按照平行原则，    “；instead，it...”    这里的it指代前句的主语Marconi多完美啊
[这里好像你已经明白了哈]

PS:偶search了cd这几题的所有帖子，没找到满意答案，但代词指代又是重要考点，所以问个究竟！期待大N们启迪，造福后人！

-- by 会员 kingarthur00 (2011/4/14 9:11:51)

-- by 会员 mongmong (2011/5/23 13:45:02)

欧阳小西

本来是来搜112的  看到这个我就阐述下个人观点

我在XDF上课老师也这么讲的   这题应该从罗技意思上说    

测谎仪使用原理是基于这样一个假定：人在撒谎时emotional会产生reactions， 然而反过来，这个emotional reactions 再create 物理性的反映。   并不是人产生，而是emotional reastions。何况语法上，如果是指individual也不会用that去指代，that用于抽象名词或不可数名词。   这里是指那个抽象的反映

open to discuss