再问OG164(大全714)(新增ETS官方回复)

livary

顶就有心了...

iris555999

牛人的牛帖。看得我都累死了。辛苦各位“前辈”了。

amy7777

看到这个贴子，震撼。第一遍看得有些不明白，先顶再看第二遍。

向CD的前辈致敬。

irenaw

    

A: The commission proposed
                that
            funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public
early next year, be

E: The commission proposed development funding for the park, which could be
open to the public early next year, is to be

A和E的区别在于这个that，没有了它，which的修饰对象就变成了funding。E前半段的的意思也变成：“委员会就公园的开发资金提出了建议”，而A的意思是“委员会建议：公园开发的资金（该公园可望于明年对公众开放）应当......“

个人意见，供大家参考

irenaw

另外，把is to be加上去，去掉中间的插入部分，E是 The commission proposed development funding for the park  is to be..... 明显不对

sinoversion

顶~~

按ETS的理解,which的修饰范围可以顺应逻辑的变化小范围的扩大

不知道这样理解对不对

ecochem

当年N人云集的盛况没赶上

只能回帖，追赶他们的足迹了！

收藏此帖，要多看几遍！

mangzi99

mangzi99

是否这样理解,如果which前面的词就是逻辑意义上which所需要修饰的,最好; 如果不是,最好参考其它考点来分析;看来只有这样了

164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development,
which could be open to the public early next year, is obtained through a
local bond issue.

(A) that funding for the park?s development, which could be open to the
public early next year, is

(B) that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the
public early next year, be

(C) funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public
early next year, to be

(D) funds for the park?s development, perhaps open to the public early
next year, be(B)

(E) development funding for the park, which could be open to the public
early next year, is to be

Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be
open... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that
could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is
needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to
be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that]
funding... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps
open to the public... to modify development; the phrase should modify
park.

Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the
commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be
open to the public....

As stated in the explanation, option A is incorrect in part because the
relative clause "which could be open to the public early next year" has no
logical referent. In option E, however, the problem with the relative clause
is less clear. While the referent for "which" is slightly ambiguous, it is
overstating the case somewhat to claim that this phrasing "seriously
distorts meaning," and we should have chosen another aspect of the option to
emphasize in explaining why it is incorrect. In this case, the use of "is to
be" creates a more obvious and important grammatical error. We will consider
revising this explanation when a new edition of the Guide is produced, and
we appreciate your bringing this matter to our attention.

sch

看了半天怎么这个结果.

ETS回信说选项A干吗,问她BE矛盾之处啊.

当然最后有点矜持地承认了,E说他seriously 曲解意思有点言过其实.算是认错了