有三道关于平行结构的题目搞不清楚，那位高手帮我解释一下

玩玩爱丽丝

第一题了解了，那个第二题呢，还有第三？？？？

玩玩爱丽丝

我自己再琢磨琢磨，总之，谢谢了

mlvince

第一题and链接strikes和holds

clumsy123

第一题了解了，那个第二题呢，还有第三？？？？

-- by 会员 玩玩爱丽丝 (2011/3/22 22:34:56)

第二，第三后面写了~

070674108

不好意思，只顾着贴答案了。我的思路和clumsy123的差不多，这边就不重复说了。
昨天下午看到manhattan上一位大牛关于parallelism的理解，觉得很精辟，贴在这里，希望对LZ有帮助。
When you read sentence correct problems, you should look for contexts that require parallelism.

Parallelism is a large-scale, context-dependent thing, so it’s imperative that you detect any necessity for it when you are reading the problem.

Not that you should not rely on “signal words” (and, or, not only… but also, etc). in order to detect parallelism, rather, you should be able to detect the necessity of parallel structure solely from context, with the signal words as a nice way to confirm that necessity.

记住：并不是看到and, but等信号词然后去找平行，凑平行。而应该是句意为先，先读懂句子，判断题目中的那种情况需不需要平行，再做判断。

clumsy123

不好意思，只顾着贴答案了。我的思路和clumsy123的差不多，这边就不重复说了。
昨天下午看到manhattan上一位大牛关于parallelism的理解，觉得很精辟，贴在这里，希望对LZ有帮助。
When you read sentence correct problems, you should look for contexts that require parallelism.

Parallelism is a large-scale, context-dependent thing, so it’s imperative that you detect any necessity for it when you are reading the problem.

Not that you should not rely on “signal words” (and, or, not only… but also, etc). in order to detect parallelism, rather, you should be able to detect the necessity of parallel structure solely from context, with the signal words as a nice way to confirm that necessity.

记住：并不是看到and, but等信号词然后去找平行，凑平行。而应该是句意为先，先读懂句子，判断题目中的那种情况需不需要平行，再做判断。

-- by 会员 070674108 (2011/3/23 12:00:55)

是的是的，强推manhattan
简直是神器