OG12 sc39求助~

aiaizun

1、A从语法上没错，但语义上来讲，有歧义。可以理解成这两个意思：
  In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so that King Henry VIII could marry Anne Boleyn.
    In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so that Queen Catherine could marry Anne Boleyn.
2、原句表示因果关系，而B中and表示并列，语义错误；so表示结果，“A，so B”中A是B的充分条件，有A即有B，取消了KH跟QC的婚礼不是KH跟AB结婚的充分条件，故语义上错误。语法上讲，也不对，and前后应平行，应该是King Henry did sth and did sth，B若改为and married to，从语法上就对了。
3、关于would先参考http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/would
4、E不是虚拟，所以不用would。题目意思是取消婚礼，以便能跟另一个人结婚。想表达的是“能”，would是“想要”，偏主观。

-- by 会员 huangyouhuifei (2011/2/25 21:51:03)

可是我觉得B选项中，由于有could的存在，把语义的错误抵消了。so表示结果，“A，so B”中A是B的充分条件，有A即有B。
B选项中，A代表事件离婚，B代表时间Henry可以和Anne结婚，注意是可以和Anne结婚，不是和Anne结婚。
所以符合有A即有B的so的用法。

有NN来解释一下为什么B选项是illogical的么~~谢谢~~

-- by 会员 jj0615 (2011/10/8 16:12:16)

OG上说 D项so 解释了主句，即寻找婚姻无效是为了跟Anne结婚，跟Anne结婚是Henry八世使婚姻无效的原因。
而B选项中的so是结果，即Henry八世使他的婚姻无效，所以可以跟Anne结婚 颠倒了原意所以错了
我的一点想法，不知道对不对

ReneeKuang

could is more appropriate than would because the annulment would not ensure his marriage—it would only enable him to marry.

ensure his marriage和 enable him to marry有什么区别呢？？og的解释让人费神啊！！！！！！！！！！！！！求指教

imlissi

The biggest problem with A is that it's not as immediately clear that HE wants to marry A.B. (it takes a couple of readings-through, for me at least, to figure that out for sure).

'So as to' isn't often the correct answer in GMAT-ville. It's somewhat wordy and awkward, although it isn't always wrong (I can't refer you to an OG problem off the top of my head where it's right, though).

--from ManhattanGMAT Staff

leonnong

这个啊，LZ，我看了CD上对这题目的讨论，说法复杂，但是OG上说是D，那你就先记住吧！咱们抗不过GMAC的。我查了so as to的用法，要求前后逻辑主语一直，可是发现这个题目还蛮适用的，都是King Henry，但是OG上解释说用这个说不清修饰的是King还是Queen，不清晰，答案就是D了。我琢磨了好久，虽然这个说法也说服不了我，但是就记住吧！

-- by 会员 Sophin (2011/2/1 22:42:22)

可是前一句逻辑主句就是King Henry，不会使Queen呀？怎么说呢？