蓝皮书 SC-41~求解

一梦千寻

The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.


(A) that a company's first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company's first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even.


除了宾语从句中that不能省略，其他没看出什么语法考点~~~求指点~

v19suffered

B读起来舒服
没看过书上的解释，试着讨论一下
A&E，like的用法是否有误，like不能接句子吧
C&D，they指代什么呢？
请指正

efrenreyes

我来说下我的看法：

首先，advise的正确用法应该是，advise sb. to do sth. 或者 advise that 从句；advise sb. that 从句，是绝对错误的用法，所以立即排除选项C&D；

选项E，将原句中first line of defense in eluding offers ，改为了first line of defense for a company，逻辑的重心有所偏移，并且is the refusal 时态也不正确，应改为be the refusal ；

选项A&B的主要差别，我认为并不在like these 和such，而是even refuse 和refuse even，因为从句主语first line of defense 限定了对应的宾语必须是refuse这类动作的词，所以选项A的even refuse 不好，暗含的假设是consultants advise之前的情形是比refuse程度低的动作，与主语defense在逻辑上不能很好对应；

选项B的refuse even，就很明确了和defense对应的肯定是refuse这个动作，只不过consultants advise了要把refuse这个动作的范围扩大一点，even扩大到refuse to take calls 的程度。

以上仅是个人见解，其实本人的语法极烂，除了一些常见的固定搭配以外，对于选项的排除基本全靠逻辑推理…………

joyfit

我就是觉得B读的舒服...不知道其他为啥不对..楼上的有见解!