ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950's, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many.

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2459|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep T2 Q185 有疑问,请大家讨论下吧

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-5 21:51:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
When drive-ins were at the height of their popularity in the late 1950s, some 4,000 existed in the United States, but today there are less than one-quarter that many
A. there are less than one-quarter that many
B. there are fewer than one-quarter as many
C. there are fewer than one-quarter of that amount
D. the number is less than one-quarter the amount
E. it is less than one-quarter of that amount

答案 B  我觉得B结构不好
原句 A 的 "less" 是修饰 one-quarter, "one-quarter that many" 是 uncountable (不可数)
但是, C 句用了 “one-quarter of the amount", amount 可以是可数也可以是不可数。如果光是看单句的话,这里的 "one-quarter of the amout" 应该是不可数。但是文中提到了 "4000"一个有概念的数量,所以这里的 "the amount" 是 指"4000",也就是可数,同样 "one-quarter of the amount" 就可数了。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-1-6 00:37:58 | 只看该作者
amount在GMAT就是不可数,记住这一点即可
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-6 08:16:53 | 只看该作者
The usage of 'AMOUNT" seems to be the apparent error in C. In syntax, it seems wrong. But,
In Longman Dictionary, although it is said that amount can be used as uncountable and countable.
But after reading the examples given carefully, it is clear that only when it means plenty of sth, amount can be considered as countable. Especially this amount is known.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-6 08:18:11 | 只看该作者
更主要的问题是,这句没有用带任何指示代词
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 12:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部