求一AA指导

xianyunfeng

“Studies have found that employees of not-for-profit organizations and charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profit corporations to perform well at work when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profit organizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is the belief that their work helps to improve society. Because they believe in the importance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even when no financial reward is present. Thus, if our corporation began donating a significant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overall profits would increase as well.”

我认为，
1、stuides 并没有提供信息证明其可靠性；
2、即便可靠，作为盈利性的公司，不会因为donation 就让our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase
3、就算2成立，也不一定能说明profit成立，since profit＝cost＋revenue，donation may 加大cost。。
求指导，我觉得第二点有点问题。。说不清楚在哪儿。

cc621josh

关于LZ的第2点，我来试试：

1) not-for-profit组织的员工可能因为参与感才意识到他们工作的重要性，而for-profit组织的donation是组织行为，不是个人行为，与个人工作的内涵与外延无关，没有让员工参与到改变社会的具体行动中，没有这种参与感员工没motivation.
2) interview有效性值得怀疑，员工可能说谎，或者interview的问题导向有问题，interviewer的interpretation有问题，导致员工受到motivated的原因可能根本不是工作的内在价值，而是studies里说的不被monitored or evaluated. 虽然这与管理中经典的霍桑实验的结论有悖，但也不是没有可能的，not-for-profit组织就比for-profit组织更不太可能经常性地monitor or evaluate.
3) 即便员工是因为工作内在改变社会的价值而提高生产率，for-profit组织也要保证donation确实能改变社会，而不是投入到糟糕的project里，没见到什么改善。
4) 即便员工因此有motivation, 也不一定能提升revenue或降低cost, 比如motivated研发人员研发出新产品，如果卖不出去不仅收益没有还增加了成本。
5) for-profit组织必须确保donation那部分的利润不是从与员工相关的支出中划出去的，即未因此影响到员工其他方面的利益，不然员工可能不愿意。

xianyunfeng

谢谢