以下是引用LES在2004-5-31 20:36:00的发言：为什么不可以？
通常A of B 结构后面加that引导的定语从句修饰A 或者B都可以的，通过从句中谓语的单复数来避免歧义。 但是这道题根本没有办法避免歧义。而且说实在的ETS好像对此也很混乱，看OG164,
164. The commission proposed that funding for the park’s development, which could be open to the public early next year, is obtained through a local bond issue. (A) that funding for the park’s development, which could be open to the public early next year, is
(B) that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be
(C) funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be
(D) funds for the park’s development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be（B）
(E) development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. Choice C omits that, the object of proposed that is needed to introduce the clause describing the proposal. C also uses to be unidiomatically where be is correct: the commission proposed [that] funding... to be obtained is wrong. Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to the public... to modify development; the phrase should modify park.
Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public.... B选项认为which是修饰park的，但是到了E却说which是修饰funding的。奇怪不？ 同样不明白。顶一下。 | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-5-31 22:13:00
