本月基金问题

elvis0214

请问nn下面两篇AA该怎么攻击呢？不是很有头绪。1. The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional life.
“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”
看不出来为什么失业率低，提供更多工作机会，和结论企业应该来H发展有什么关系。都说the conclusion appears somewhat convincing, 但怎么感觉这里都不能推理了。。。


2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the information technology department of a major advertising firm:
“The more efficient a firm’s employees are, the more profitable that firm will be. Improvements in a firm’s information technology hardware and software
are a proven way to increase the efficiency of employees who do the majority of their work on computers. Therefore, if our firm invests in the most
powerful and advanced information technology available, employee productivity will be maximized. This strategy ensures that every dollar spent on
enhanced information technology will help to increase our firm’s profit margins.”
这题，除了依靠电脑工作的员工不能代表整体员工外。还有什么比较清晰的漏洞伐？特别是可以使用七宗罪的。感觉基金写的思路要么比较难写（边际效益），要么有些问题（文章并没说只有it才能提高效率）。


写作比较烂，只有靠nn指点了。。。谢谢！！

beiminghanxing

菜鸟的意见：
1你说的这个错误叫做“vague evidence”——题干中提供的原因不足以得出其结论,貌似不是七宗罪里面的因此不用费太多笔墨去驳斥吧。就说证据不明确，一个地方是否利于一个企业发展应该看它的市场，经济活跃度，消费水平。。。
2错误：投资最先进的技术不一定能使用电脑员工的生产力达到最高，即使用电脑员工生产力提高也不能得出全体员工的效率提高，即使全体员工效率提高也不能推出利润就会高