ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: caopp
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Jon, need some advice

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-28 11:14:47 | 只看该作者
拿板凳,等建议。

//睡觉去了,明天再来看。
12#
发表于 2010-9-28 12:14:05 | 只看该作者
To 楼主:

It's better to be rejected by Princeton than by yourself.
                                         ——Mr. 李泰伯, the laureate of 高考北京卷 this year
13#
发表于 2010-9-29 12:46:59 | 只看该作者
Gosh, it appears that I have caused quite a commotion.  J  But I am so glad that everyone is checking in, and sharing their expertise!  Let’s try to settle this issue once and for all.  And remember, there are certain questions where admissions people cannot be fully honest.  The issues of quotas, student body mix, etc. is certainly one of them.

One of the greatest lessons I have learned guys, is that this process is at its core a math problem.  Most business issues are, at their core, a math problem.

Take for example two identical candidates.  They are both from Sri Lanka.  They both got 700 on their GMAT. They both went to good undergraduate schools, and they both wrote good essays.  But one candidate is a man, and one candidate is a woman.  Two IDENTICAL candidates otherwise.  Well, the woman has an advantage.  Why?  Because there are fewer women applying then men.  It’s just a math problem.

Lets do this a different way.  There are two candidates.  They both scored a 700 on the GMAT.  They both worked for goldman sachs, and both wrote great essays (with our help of course).  But one candidate is from China, and the other is from the Philippines.  Other than that, they are two identical candidates.  Well, the Philippino has the advantage.  Why?  Because there are fewer Philippinos applying than Chinese.

I hope this helps my friends.  Always remember, most problems can be boiled down to math!  But let’s keep the healthy discussing going!  It is great to see so many passionate people out there.
Best of luck,

Jon Frank
14#
发表于 2010-9-29 13:17:43 | 只看该作者
赞,JF 数学哥
15#
发表于 2010-9-29 13:45:00 | 只看该作者
Frank讲了两个类比的故事,希望可以帮到LZ。
第一个故事是,一个地方来的,女的有优势,似乎全世界通用;
第二个故事是,不同地方来的,非中国人有优势,同上。

天哪,悲哀的中国man!!
-- by 会员 ningchunlong (2010/9/29 13:11:28)



话说比起中国男人来,印度搞IT的男人更悲惨……
16#
发表于 2010-9-29 16:31:34 | 只看该作者
中国男人真这么倒霉吗?
17#
发表于 2010-9-29 16:51:04 | 只看该作者
Frank讲了两个类比的故事,希望可以帮到LZ。
第一个故事是,一个地方来的,女的有优势,似乎全世界通用;
第二个故事是,不同地方来的,非中国人有优势,同上。

天哪,悲哀的中国man!!
-- by 会员 ningchunlong (2010/9/29 13:11:28)




话说比起中国男人来,印度搞IT的男人更悲惨……
-- by 会员 shaoqiye (2010/9/29 13:45:00)



中国男人确实比较惨,呵呵。人家印度男至少说英文啊
一直觉得印度人是申请英美高校的奇葩啊,明明英语是官方语言但还是按非英语国家算,赚翻了!!
18#
发表于 2010-9-29 17:01:33 | 只看该作者
Frank讲了两个类比的故事,希望可以帮到LZ。
第一个故事是,一个地方来的,女的有优势,似乎全世界通用;
第二个故事是,不同地方来的,非中国人有优势,同上。

天哪,悲哀的中国man!!
-- by 会员 ningchunlong (2010/9/29 13:11:28)





话说比起中国男人来,印度搞IT的男人更悲惨……
-- by 会员 shaoqiye (2010/9/29 13:45:00)




中国男人确实比较惨,呵呵。人家印度男至少说英文啊
一直觉得印度人是申请英美高校的奇葩啊,明明英语是官方语言但还是按非英语国家算,赚翻了!!
-- by 会员 usocean (2010/9/29 16:51:04)



你可以试试印度人的pool,全都是高gmat,高toefl,一水的IT,能要你命……
19#
发表于 2010-9-29 17:27:23 | 只看该作者
"With our help of course."
I like you Jon!
20#
发表于 2010-9-29 17:53:59 | 只看该作者
不知道同样是750的男生和女生,谁的机会更大?美国申请人的情形和中国申请人的情形能够无差别地进行对等推理吗?
据我看到的一个帖子,一个在校生说挺面试官谈到,中国面试者中70%是女生......不知道是不是普遍现象。不过,我目前接触的申请人中,的确女性偏多!而且美国人近期的一个调查也显示,中国女性的确比美国女性更有进取心。

其他还有一些片断内容,你可以到这个帖子里面去看看,有几个人恰好集中讨论了几句,还好没有被ADMIN判定为灌水:
http://forum.chasedream.com/North_American_MBA/thread-477891-2-1.html
-- by 会员 ningchunlong (2010/9/29 16:44:42)



我也发现了,去MBA tour,感觉女生多!
还是要结合中国国情了,这也是毛泽东思想的精髓。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 01:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部