ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2689|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD22-20哪位NN帮忙看一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-24 13:34:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q20:
Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.



  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

    这题到底选A还是B呀,搞不清楚,but also这里到底要不要加it。。。哪位NN帮忙看一下。。。谢谢啦。。。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-24 13:44:26 | 只看该作者
选b?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-24 13:50:57 | 只看该作者
我GWD第六套的时候做到这题是选B,刚才做22套的时候对答案看是A,我很confused,不知道这个it的问题。。。
地板
发表于 2010-9-29 09:44:22 | 只看该作者
prep答案选D,你们的答案好像不对呀。

逻辑关系是转折时,不能用not only...but also...
not only...but also表示互相强调

From Manhattan:
Even if it were used with proper parallelism, the "not only ... but also" construction still wouldn't be appropriate here. Rhetorically, the "not only ... but also" construction is used for 2 parallel items that reinforce each other.
Example: Weight training not only increases muscle mass and strength but also boosts bone density. --> notice that the two effects mentioned are both positive effects.

In this sentence, the 2 effects are contrasting: the first half (farmland/ houses/ furniture) is positive, but the second half (erosion/deforestation) is negative. Thus, "not only ... but also" is inappropriate; just use traditional "but (also)", by itself, instead. that's exactly what choice (d) does.
5#
发表于 2010-9-29 09:52:26 | 只看该作者
以下引自旧贴(讨论很多):http://forum.chasedream.com/archiver/GMAT_SC/thread-55382-20.html

A.    not only 位于句首时,所引导的句子要用倒装,give和create是and连接的两个并列成分,而时态已经被did提前,只能用原形。所以这里gave错。But it also没有错。例见大全354.
B.    Which定语从句修饰farmland,逻辑意义错误,是systematic clearing给了consumers houses and furniture,不是farmland。
C.    But also之前无谓语,片段。
D.    正确。But it also,转折前后句,说明systematic clearing既带来了好东西,也带了坏东西,also的使用,精妙。
E.     Giving修饰created,改变了原来的句意:并列的两个动作。the systematic clearing of forests  not only... but ( also) ,主语已经存在了,but 后面的It多余
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 01:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部