ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2959|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

从新prep1 188想到的

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-15 21:49:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
188.(26379-!-item-!-188;#058&001961)



Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

A. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are

B. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

C. Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are

D. Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

E. Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,

这也也是一道旧prep的题
正确答案是A,做错过的时候选的是E
我认为A中的having是省略了主语的状语。该句可以使Having……,N are……
因为having……其实就是省略了相同的主语和从句引导词的状语从句。还原后是After N have ……,N are……

对于E选项来说drawing是伴随状语。但是伴随状语要求两个状态或是动作同时发生。很明显这两个动作不能动时发生。(估计想伴随have done是不是都要用having done)

请问各位牛人这样的思路是否正确?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-9-15 23:30:06 | 只看该作者
顺带问一句: 伴随状语之前是否能加修饰成分,如lz题目中的E中的now是不是不应该加?

Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge, (now) drawing solid...
板凳
发表于 2010-9-16 01:07:24 | 只看该作者
鄙人认为这道题 之所以不选E是因为  E改变了原句的合理重心。
原句的having ...knowledge  这个是作为定语来修饰... scientists 的,而原句的主干就是scientists draw solid conclusion to sth.

而E选项使得各成分的关系颠倒了。。。。
不知道这样解释清不清楚?

还有我认为在伴随状语前加上 now ,currently  这些词应该是没有关系的

但是GMAT语法题有个原则是不改变原句的合理重心及意思,所以这个要分情况的~!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 10:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部