关于OG AI里面有一道题，我的想法，请牛人们指教

桑子夏

我今天才开始看AWA（貌似是有点晚了。。。），看到OG第一篇AI，忍不住想了一下提纲，我的纠结之处在于：
到底需不需要take a stand啊？一定要选二者之一么？！

题目如下：
"people often complain that products are not made to last. They feel that making products that wear out fairly quickly wastes both natural and human resources. What they fail to see, however, is that such manufacturing practices keep costs down for the consumer and stimulate demand."

Which do you find more compelling:the complaint about products that do not last or the response to it?

我的想法：
1. Different ranges of products vary in their functions and utilities, hence the requirements of durability vary. --e.g.s
2. Both argument did not categorize products, but generally discuss whether they last.
3. The value associated with some certain products may not lie in its durability, such as…, hence not all products need to last long, they are not meant to. The manufacturing then focus on satisfying the specific customer needs and competitive costing instead of overly concern on the durability. These ranges of products do function as the counter-argument.
4. However, not all products are of such nature. Bla bla bla
Concl: we need to differentiate and categorize.