ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1482|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

比较的一道题,不知道来源,求解...谢谢各位了!实在想不明白怎么还原~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-1 23:39:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Although Napoleon’s army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.
(A) they had in their previous campaigns
(B) their previous campaigns had had
(C) they had for any previous campaign
(D) in their previous campaigns
(E) for any previous campaign
选E
怎么完整than后面的句子?
我选的D,所以希望看大家是怎么还原的...谢谢啦^_^
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-1 23:42:04 | 只看该作者
再来一道
A study commissioned by the Department of Agriculture showed that if calves exercise and associate with other calves,they require less medication and gain weight more quickly than those raised in confinement.(含义上有歧义的情况下才需要补出动词)
我原以为than 后面是those raised in confinement do.
在《比较之庖丁解牛》中,主语的比较都是要加助动词的,如I eat apple faster than you do.
为什么这句就是说只要没有歧义就可以不补do?到底要不要按照规则来,还是以简洁、无歧义为主?
板凳
发表于 2010-9-2 03:12:35 | 只看该作者
with far more supplies than (supplies)for any previous campaign
supply后面就是搭配for
D的their也用的不对,前面是army,单数。
地板
发表于 2010-9-2 03:16:48 | 只看该作者
第二题不会解释,等待牛牛~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-2 23:49:18 | 只看该作者
回复3楼:
got it~原来是supply for这个词组的原因啊~没想到啊没想到...谢谢你哈^_^
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-30 10:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部