这句话的逻辑是对比。比的是plan,一个是ambitious plan,一个是a series of small steps,前后两个plan的目的都是protect salmon等鱼类。 决定推迟前一个,而是(决定)实施后一个。否定的不是to protect鱼类,而是否定的ambitious的方式。 C的逻辑instead否的貌似是前面的for protecting salmon的purpose,逻辑上不通。
Finally reaching a decision on an issue that has long been politically charged
in the Pacific Northwest, politicians decided to postpone by at least five years
an ambitious plan to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, instead
of which they proposed a series of smaller steps, by which they intend to protect the fish.
B.politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan
to protect wild salmon and other endangered fish, proposing instead a
series of smaller steps intended.
C.politicians decided to postpone by at least five years an ambitious plan
for protecting wild salmon and other endangered fish, and instead they
proposed a series of smaller steps, intending. 答案是B, C哪里错了呢?表示目的也可以用for啊,那个intending不是指they(politicians)吗? 一时想不通呢。。。
-- by 会员 yzqsyy (2010/8/15 22:24:15) [/quote] |