ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1392|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道OG上的题目,谢谢各位XDJM~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-15 13:46:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Salt deposits and moisture threaten to destroy the Mohenjo-Daro excavation in Pakistan, the site of an ancient civilization that flourished at the same time as the civilizations in the Nile Delta and the river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates.
A. that flourished at the same time as teh civilizations
D. flourishing at the same time as those did
E. flourishing at the same time as those were
答案是A,我的疑问是为什么civilizations后面不用补个did之类的,ETS给出的对于D和E的错误解释中还提到了did和were是awkward and unnecessary的。。。疑惑啊,什么时候要省略谓语呢??
谢谢大家解惑~~
(上题为OG12  673  第85题)
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-15 20:04:44 | 只看该作者
我也很疑问这道题,想来想去,一般需要补出谓语的时候,是怕比较的对象会跟原来句子的宾语产生歧义。比如:
I eat more apple than you do我吃的苹果比你多, I eat more apple than you 我吃苹果比吃你多,就不对了。这里补补补补都没有歧义,反正后面也没有宾语,所以就不用补了。
至于D、E,特地去翻了OG:
D、Plural pronoun those cannot refer to the singular civilization and thus lacks a referent; did is awkward and unnecessary.
E、Plural pronoun those cannot refer to the singular civilization and thus lacks a referent; were is awkward and unnecessary
都说的是unnecessary,就是没有必要补出来的意思
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-17 20:34:44 | 只看该作者
有道理,谢谢LS~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-14 03:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部