gwd-1-16 弱问。。。关于比较。。。

fannybeibei

可是。。。a greater proportion than in any previous election
这前一部分并没有时间状语in xxx 出现呀。。。

好吧。。。诶。。。我确实还一直想蛮多的。。。。。。。。。。。真是很无聊的癖好啊。。。

yxs157

可是。。。a greater proportion than in any previous election
这前一部分并没有时间状语in xxx 出现呀。。。

好吧。。。诶。。。我确实还一直想蛮多的。。。。。。。。。。。真是很无聊的癖好啊。。。

-- by 会员 fannybeibei (2010/7/16 22:30:27)

怎么没有？in the presidential campaign of 1992

fannybeibei

哦，对哦，看到了。。。～～～

yuanjolly

if insistin using the than it was, it should use than it costed or it did to be parallel,,,,,,,,,,,,

fannybeibei

if insistin using the than it was, it should use than it costed or it did to be parallel,,,,,,,,,,,,

-- by 会员 yuanjolly (2010/7/17 20:24:29)

IMO, if "it" refers to "  proportion" instead of "costs", i think "it was" is fine~~~

Gembraco

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been

a greater proportion than (the porportion television costs accounted for ) in any previous election

要比较的话，是 名词proportion和名词proportion之间的比较，因此 it was, they have been无法指代省略的内容

gracefighting

a greater proportion 实际上是 half the spending 的同位语 ，你把它替换进去

soaring television costs accounted for a greater proportion in the presidential campaign of 1922 than (**** costs accounted for the proportion ) in  any previous election.


按这个结构的话，it 指代的是costs , was 也就不对了

这题重点在于 a greater proportion 实际上是句子宾语的同位语，就是说它做宾语，又怎么能 was呢

fannybeibei

哦，终于弄懂了，谢谢LS两位了～～～～～～～～～～～