ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1716|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全 10

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-2 22:42:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
10. A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago.
(A) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(B) and make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(C) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago
(D) to make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years agoC
(E) in making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it as five years ago


我知道A错在哪里。
C用了it was five years ago,prep2的96题说,用it/they指代句子前面出现过的事物时,精确指代前文出现的该特定事物,该事物的修饰成分、特性均被继承在it/they当中: more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now as it was in 1990.  it指代现在通过电能产生的energy...

请教请教到底应该是怎样……
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-2 23:28:23 | 只看该作者
我觉得如果是making的话,应该是修饰的前面的整个句子,从逻辑上讲是A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year使得建筑业更加鲁棒, 个人感觉应该选B。不知道对不对,呵呵
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-4 23:34:24 | 只看该作者
如今都没人答题了
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-31 05:38:06 | 只看该作者
快一个月了,继续顶这个问题……
因为发现好多地方都出现这个用法了。
5#
发表于 2010-9-3 14:24:23 | 只看该作者
这题我怎么觉得解释是错的,making显然应该修饰主句的主语吧,修饰的是A rise吧?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 14:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部