ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The spraying of pesticides can be carefully planned, but accidents, weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had anticipated.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 20649|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

cannot be foreseen 还是foreseeable

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-7 16:38:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
830.The spraying of pesticides can be carefully planned, but accidents, weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had anticipated.
(A) weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had
(B) weather conditions that cannot be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
(C) unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors are the cause of much larger deposits of spray than they had
(D) weather conditions that are not foreseeable, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
(E) unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had
the key:B

D为什么不对呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-8 11:07:42 | 只看该作者
830.The spraying of pesticides can be carefully planned, but accidents, weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had anticipated.
(A) weather conditions that could not be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had
(B) weather conditions that cannot be foreseen, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
(C) unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors are the cause of much larger deposits of spray than they had
(D) weather conditions that are not foreseeable, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than
(E) unforeseeable weather conditions, and pilot errors often cause much larger deposits of spray than they had
the key:B

D为什么不对呢?
-- by 会员 victorbj262 (2010/6/7 16:38:19)


个人觉得是简洁性问题,就好像can优于be able to 一样
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-6-8 13:01:35 | 只看该作者
是否是not foreseeable, 应用unforeseeable?
地板
发表于 2010-6-8 13:55:43 | 只看该作者
1. 表达能不能,为了表达得更准确,如果是可能性用can,如果是能力be able to.
2. 否定尽量用not+adj.不要用unadj.因为unadj不够准确

个人观点....
5#
发表于 2010-7-28 17:57:29 | 只看该作者
出现情态动词一般不能随意删除。can最好保留

D中weather conditions that are not foreseeable的定语从句显得罗嗦,完全可以用形容词定语搞定
6#
发表于 2010-8-4 17:08:41 | 只看该作者
我觉的是foreseeable表示能力,同be able to,weather condition没有foresee的能力,只有人有,所以用can+被动的语态表示能被“人”预测出。所以选B。

我做的时候也错了这道,所以就这样理解的。不知道对不对。
7#
发表于 2010-8-4 18:41:00 | 只看该作者
我是这样理解的 因为pilot errors后面跟了动词 cause ,所以为了平行weather conditions后面就是cannot be foreseen,还有就是动词foresee>形容词forseeable,不知道对不对呐哈
8#
发表于 2010-8-9 04:55:18 | 只看该作者
我觉得应该是通过平行对称的原则来判断选B吧,
D中 "and" 前面是个主系表结构,后面是个主谓宾结构,
而B中的 "and" 前后都是主谓宾结构,更符合平行对称原则

所以答案选B
9#
发表于 2010-11-6 09:54:05 | 只看该作者
B表示(不能被预测的)天气状况。D表示天气状况不能被预测,是个非名词的句子,无论在语义还是在语法结构上都不如B好
10#
发表于 2011-3-26 21:18:35 | 只看该作者
首先这替考的是平行 accidents,weather conditions,pilot errors 都是名词

A.could错误使用过去式but前面是can;they指代问题 语法上指代pilot errors 逻辑上应该是 人 ;过去完成时也不对

C.unforeseeable weather conditions不平行; are the cause wordy 不如动词 cause;they had 同A

D.看到 that are     wordy 直接排除

E.同C
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 00:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部