我要疯了，OG两道题的解释怎么是自相矛盾的啊？

lr081919

大家看两道题
Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontariorequires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A)that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are

(B)that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills

(C)to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are

(D)to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
（E）to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills
Choice A is best. In choice B, should is illogical after requires, or at least unnecessary, and so is better omitted; in choices B and E, job does not agree in number with jobs; and in choices B, D, and E, the wording illogically describes the comparable skills rather than the jobs as being "usually held by men." Choices C, D, and E produce the ungrammatical construction requires of... employers to pay, in which of makes the phrase incorrect.In C, the use of in rather than for is unidiomatic, and jobs of comparable skill confusedly suggests that the jobs rather than the workers possess the skills. In D, the phrase beginning regardless ... is awkward and wordy in addition to being illogical.
阴影部分是说require of...to do...这个结构是错的，对吧？
再看另外一道题
      Because of the enormous research and

development expenditures required to survive in the electronics industry, an industry marked by rapid innovation and volatile demand, such firms tend to be very large.

(A)to survive

(B)of firms to survive

(C)for surviving

(D)for survival

（E）for firms' survival
The subject of the main clause (such firms) presumes a prior reference to the firms in question. Furthermore, the logical subject of to survive and the logical complement of required should be made explicit. All three demands are met by B, the best choice. Choices A, C, and D, with no reference to the firms in question, meet none of these demands. In choice E, the illogical and awkward use of a prepositional phrase (for firms' survival) buries the needed initial reference to firms in a possessive modifier.
答案选的是B，但这不是错的一个结构吗？？
啊……我晕了……

carlosh

确实啊 你这是og第几版？

crazyxxx

我觉得,是for jobs和for a job不对等的原因才剔出E

不过,og上的确有矛盾之处...不知道nn有什么更好的解释

silent7706

No no. 不矛盾。
1st sentence, A requires(verb) of B that blah blah

2nd sentence, A required(past participle) of B to do blah blah

maxawei

今天我也做到这两道题了，第一道里面OG 的解释确实是和第二题里面矛盾的，OG难得出错阿!  不过不影响最后答案就是了，因为第一题里面C选项还有其他错误，错应该不在require of sb to do...

MarsTOF

3L说的挺对的。。

ran2010zx

嘿嘿这个其实不是这样理解的亲
这里的OG并不矛盾
第一个错的原因在于：require for中的for 是因为PAY FOR，并非require 。。。for
第二个中required是过去分词作定语，并非是require ... of 的搭配
希望对你有帮助啊