一道疑惑很久的题目~

ranshuyang

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？ 我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

silent7706

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？ 我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

-- by 会员 ranshuyang (2010/5/23 9:00:40)

我也有类似的疑问。但是你看所有选项都有分号。所以只能选比较好的那个。