ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planetwide destruction.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3160|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新prep 1-246

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-29 23:17:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
246.(31468-!-item-!-188;#058&005866)(GWD-9-Q27)



Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planetwide destruction.

A. and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but

B. and, if it would strike Earth, part of the planet could experience a tremendous amount of damage but it would

C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would

D. and that, if Earth is struck by it, can do part of the planet tremendous damage, but it would

E. and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but


答案是C

这道题还没有人问过,我不太明白为什么选C,和其他选项的错误点。请NN帮忙解释解释,多谢了!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-30 00:54:25 | 只看该作者
小弟不才~我絕得應該是AB 應該是AND THAT要和前面平行

然後D的假設用法 變成可能性大的假設
      E的假設語氣 STRIKES就不對了~~
      最後C的 WERE TO  ....,COULD....是正確的和真理相反的假設~

小弟不才~~參考看看囉
板凳
发表于 2011-4-16 18:29:58 | 只看该作者
顶起来!~

我不明白笔记中对B的解释“if和but后面的it都指代part of the planet,两个都指代错误”,if后的it为什么指part of the planet??
地板
发表于 2011-4-16 22:54:11 | 只看该作者
个人觉得这题考的是虚拟语气

假设一种没有发生的情况,和这种假设情况下所可能发生的情况
5#
发表于 2018-8-25 09:09:17 | 只看该作者
if it were个人感觉虚拟语气,直接选了C。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 13:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部