885-D-19

好好学习

         Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he

(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that 　 he had

(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he

(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

答案B。可是句中有明显的过去时间状语，而没有“过去的过去”表达，怎么能用过去未完成时？我选A。请nn指教。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-1 0:57:09编辑过]

bebexu

one is in 886


the second the sentence is in 896


there can be a comparision


if A


Just because......didn't mean


what's the subject of the sentence

好好学习

谢谢bebexu回贴,让我感到cd真是一个团结、合作的大家庭。我们为一个共同的目的走到一起，呵呵。



不过我还是认为这题答案有误。A中because引导的是一个名词性从句，本身当然可以充当主语。而B中had occupied and fortified London in 886，一个动词过去时态和一个过去完成时态并行似乎不妥。另外，in 886我认为是两个动作共同的时间状语。


最后，A中的表达在阅读和口语中都是很常见的句型。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-2 0:16:22编辑过]

bebexu

Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 我想这是个从句吧


我插了一下可以做主语的从句


1。 由what 等代词引导的


2。 由连词that引导


3。连接代词或连接副词


but    because 是一个附属连词，a中的表达在阅读和口语中都是很常见的句型。没有看到过这样的例子.    


had occupied and (had)fortified London in 886


这个had 好像一直都不用加的


had done 的时态主要在两个事件有比较的时候用


不知说得对不对，请指教

好好学习

bebexu MM做学问真是严谨啊。值得学习呵呵。


你所说的是有道理。只是我无法接受过去完成时态用于具体的过去时间事实。