[求助]og-184-解释不明

weiyu · 发表于 2004-3-28 11:33:00

看看Pumpkin MM提供的巨好的语法网站http://www.grammarbook.com/; 没征得她的同意就擅自贴处. 别杂偶!!!!

hpp920 · 发表于 2004-8-13 10:39:00

pumpkin MM的这个帖好棒, 顶!

唐三彩 · 发表于 2004-9-10 09:48:00

关于这个问题的最新解释，2个T可以并在一块了。。。。。。。。

行缘 · 发表于 2006-3-6 18:19:00

我比较笨，觉得还是没清楚,是不是:

1.and 和 yet规则相同

2.如果and/yet后面没有主语，则加不加语法上都可以，但要根据句意连贯和是否需要强调考虑．

3.如果and/yet后面有主语，则必须加，但上面举的because的例子就可以特殊吗？

mymengming · 发表于 2008-5-20 10:07:00

Thank you for your message concerning question 184 in the Sentence

Correction section of The Official Guide for GMAT Review. You indicated that

you were confused by the explanation for why option (E) is incorrect.

The explanation does contain an error; while a comma before "yet" might be

added for emphasis, it is not required because, as you point out, "yet are

slipping since then" is not an independent clause. The rest of the

explanation does accurately describe the grammatical and rhetorical problems

with option (E).

Again, thank you for taking the time to point out this error. We are always

grateful to receive inquiries such as yours because they help us to improve

the quality of our tests and test preparation materials.

dcmczj · 发表于 2008-8-27 05:03:00

up great !!!

lxx0930 · 发表于 2015-2-22 11:58:42

谢谢啊~~~感觉现在还很受惠~~~

所属分类: 下线版块