再请教大全374

stella131

1.                             In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than $16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.

(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected

(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers

(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers

(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected

(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

请问这题是根据句子含义来判断的吗？

还有其他语法点吗？

先谢谢了～～～

weiyu

cars that were test-driven, 名词+that is+adj罗嗦错误 排除A, Efficeffice" />

B it指代cars,数不一致,错

C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错

当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心

pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱

pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价

ecsniffer

stella这题我是这样判断的


根据with独立主格结构，排除B，C，E


D优于A，在于D加出了having，这样更好地表明了原因for...


agreed to pay...的原因是an automobile manufacturer has test-driven cars


Appreciate more disussions!!!


    

ecsniffer

以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-18 22:06:00的发言：
cars that were test-driven, 名词+that is+adj罗嗦错误 排除A, Efficeffice" />

B it指代cars,数不一致,错

C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错

当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心

pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱

pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价

weiyu讲解的比我好多了，学习，学习！！！

tania

以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-18 22:06:00的发言：
cars that were test-driven, 名词+that is+adj罗嗦错误 排除A, E

B it指代cars,数不一致,错

C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错 （这个说法有依据吗？为什么错呢？）

当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心

pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱

pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价

岁寒三宝

回5楼的MM，having been done/having done 修饰名词，是这个名词自己被自己done的意思吧，荒谬，所以错。类似的例子还有OG183, avoid being stolen; 大全119 be able to be programmed to,大全214，239等等

amy7777

看了这一题所有的讨论贴，不明白的如下，

1  句意：在1987.12 一家汽车制造厂请求"庭外和解"对于里程计的控诉并同意支付由于制造里程计没有联接的试驾车 超过16000000的损失赔偿  

看不懂，好几种翻译都不同，怎么办呢？？？请NN看看，

2  这句话的意思是对修改里程表这件事做出赔偿，
test-driven adj.
如果理解为对cars的赔偿，(a)中应该为test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected比较简洁，且damage to something的搭配比较合理；(b)(c)中的it, 不合理；(e)中have表示主动拥有cars, (d)中的固定搭配have something done, 合理

请问这个test-driven是动词还是名词，因为看到有贴说是have done sth  是have sth done的倒装，

3  pleaed no test to criminal charges of odometer tapering 承认自己的对里程表做手脚违法行为

cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected 试开的车其里程表没接线，这样即使试开的车被是开了很久，由于里程表不仍显示很低的里程数，仍可卖好价钱

看了这个有点明白，但还是不完全明白。

NN们来啊，这题我完全昏头了，

谢谢

amy7777

UP

amy7777

NN们这个问题想不通呢，谢谢。

sinoversion

以下是引用weiyu在2004-3-18 22:06:00的发言：
cars that were test-driven, 名词+that is+adj罗嗦错误
        排除A, E

B it指代cars,数不一致,错

            

C 名词+having been done/ having done修饰, 错
            

当然, 主要应考虑逻辑意思,这才是GMAT语法的核心
            

pay +钱+for sth: 买东西化了多少钱
            

pay+钱+for doing sth: 化多少钱为自己的...行为付出代价
        

他讲的很清楚了...