恩~不能妄断它就是做状语~先从逻辑判断它究竟修饰的是什么~然后看会不会有歧义 prep中有很多这样的题~笔记也讲的比较清楚~可以参考下~ -- by 会员 lorrain_cc (2009/11/8 5:23:23)
白勇的一道题和对C不对的解释
In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees’ paychecks, for those of them assigned(B)
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them
C选项 having been assigned 的功能有三种可能性:
1. 作为伴随结果状语,却与主句没有因果关系。
2. 作为伴随动作状语,主句主语some governments却不能充当分词短语的逻辑主语
3. 就近作定语,但现在分词的完成时态不能作定语修饰名词 |