T-3-Q2

adamzhao604

你说错了 独立主格是 名词或者代词+非谓语动词 或者形容词短语 介词短语

这个不是独立主格

独立主格有独立的主语和谓语动词（或表语）

这里是with 引导的介词短语作状语，result后that引导了一个同位语

独立结构, 没有读出歧义来!

-- by 会员 serendipityh (2009/10/20 18:16:00)

-- by 会员 kaikaichen (2010/9/4 17:23:34)

-- by 会员 339215262 (2011/4/5 10:18:49)

here is my understanding....  and not sure if absolute  phrases means the same as “独立主格”.


"Absolute Phrase" - composed of a NOUN + NOUN MODIFIER;  there is an option that you can add "WITH" in the front.


     Example:       Owen walked out of the store, his head held high.  [an absolute phrase, serving as an adverbial clause]
                 OR   Owen walked out of the store, with his head held high [still an absolute phase, serving as an adverbial clause]
                                                                                      
in the choice E:
..., with + the result [NOUN] +that .... [NOUN MODIFIER]  - a perfect structure of Absolute Phrase.


note that,
I'd rather not consider the "THAT ~ Clause" an appositive clause [同位语], because you can not equate THE RESULT to THE ACT OF STINGING; Therefore, it is Relative Clause led by a Relative Pronoun "that" [or call it Subordinator].


hope it helps.

GMATEVA

with型的独立主格是 with+宾语+宾补（V-ed/V-ing/介词短语/形容次短语）
而with+N+定语从句不属于独立主格
这个形式是做非限定性修饰前面的名词的定于

同位语和独立主格的区别在于
同位语是解释
而独立主格是同时发生生

此题中，这两个意义貌似都说得通。。。总之 其它选项排除了 反正E是正解

xysowlly

GMATEVA 发表于 2012-11-26 13:50
with型的独立主格是 with+宾语+宾补（V-ed/V-ing/介词短语/形容次短语）而with+N+定语从句不属于独立主格这 ...

我也认为 E的 with 不是独立主格， 是做非限定性定语，修饰前方名词。   但是如果修饰前方名词，这里应该只能修饰  where it is inserted?（  看做一个名词成分）     但是逻辑上，  这里应该是个结果状语修饰前方整个句子， 想请问  gmateva，   with +N  （非独立主格） 除了修饰前方名词 还有 修饰句子（类似独立主格的功能）  的功能吗？

zxppx

193. (T-3-Q2) this不能指代整个句子的意思， with the result thatAs the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing the bee to sustain a fatal injury.
A.     As the honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed, staying where it is inserted, this results in the act of stinging causing                           
staying夹心修饰         this不能指代前面整个句子
B.     As the heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes            
缺乏主句
C.     The honeybee’s stinger, heavily barbed and staying where it is inserted, results in the fact that the act of stinging causes         
错误将蜜蜂的刺作为导致蜜蜂丧命的原因
D.     The heavily barbed stinger of the honeybee stays where it is inserted, and results in the act of stinging causing                 
错误将蜜蜂的刺作为导致蜜蜂丧命的原因
...results in the act of stinging causing...
WRONG. this doesn't result in the act of stinging itself; it results in what is caused by the act of stinging.
You can only say "X results in Y" when X is an ACTION. if X is an OBJECT, you can NEVER say that X "results" in anything.
E.     The honeybee’s stinger is heavily barbed and stays where it is inserted, with the result that the act of stinging causes

manhattan的解释：http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/as-the-honeybee-s-stinger-is-heavily-barbed-t7194.html

FTKJ

瞧一瞧看一看

poorling911

个人认为不是独立主格结构，因为causes并不是the honeybee’s stinger的动作，状态
下面是prep2008中关于with独立主格结构的：

注意点：有时候with + noun. + modifier其实是单纯的介宾短语，而不是独立主格结构，一定要注意从逻辑上进行区分（如果从语法上入手区分会太耗费时间也没有必要，特此再次强调要从逻辑看语法的重要性），比如这个正确的句子OG13-7：The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye. 因为called ommatidia并不是表示miniature eyes的动作、状态等独立主格表示出来的逻辑，本质上with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia并非独立主格结构，而是单纯的介词短语，介词短语修饰的是其临近的名词或名词短语，在此根据逻辑with短语修饰临近的the compound insect eye。

shjtSAIF

you can only say "X results in Y" when X is an ACTION. if X is an OBJECT, you can NEVER say that X "results" in anything--this kills choices (c) and (d), in which "stinger" is the subject of the verb "results".