请教OG12-SC133

LZBNJJ

请教OG12-SC133

本题涉及到了分词修饰，时态不一致却正确的一些比较难理解的知识点~高人解释下哈~

sylviadyh

同问。把题目也贴上来

133. Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
答案是选(B)，不太明白OG中对(D)选项的解释“To require obscures the urpose of the laws"

这里怎么区别requiring和to require?请NN们指教

JJJooe

这个问题我也思考过
一般to do不定式放在名词后句子前面是有动词的吧
因为to do不定式表达目的所以前面有动词比较常见
当然也有就是名词后放不定式的
那就一定要是这个名词的目的就是xxx才能这么用了

除此以外一般修饰名词
要不就是定语从句
要不就是动名词作后置定语喽

sylviadyh

TKS~~明白点啦~~

sunnyice

OG的解释是，requiring在这道题里是最简洁直接地修饰laws的方法。如果用to require，则表明laws的目的是require...，而其实law的目的是to protect. 所以要用requiring而不用to require。

zty198747

如果C选项把protect改成protects是正确答案吗？OG后面的解释说“that requir”是冗长不必要的。为什么呀？

kunming

批判的看哈
that在这里是定语从句，定law，而that又在定从中作主语，所以可以省略。
如果that后面接完整的主谓，则that引的是同位，则不可省略，但这里不是。所以不可以省略!

fansail

OG10的解释比较清楚：

To use an infinitive, to require, seems to indicate that requiring these devices is the objective of the laws, when in fact the objective is to protect the sea turtles.

flyfighter

为什么C选项中的require不能修饰Law，然后require + protect 构成虚拟语气呢？

billxxyy

法律内容一律用ing形式。