ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: aimcreate
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 47

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-5-20 21:58:00 | 只看该作者
楼上的说得清楚
12#
发表于 2005-5-24 15:09:00 | 只看该作者
and引导并列成分如果是词组如to do或 for doing什么时候可以省略and后的介词什么时候不能省略呢?感觉这种并列考过很多,但我还没总结。
13#
发表于 2005-5-24 15:42:00 | 只看该作者
A是Run-on,肯定错!
14#
发表于 2005-5-25 17:00:00 | 只看该作者

这两天重点看了一下比较或平行对象是介词结构的题,发现省略不省略介词的都有!如这一题省略了to,而更多的题没有省略介词。为什么??


如54. Galileo was convinced that natural phenomena, as manifestations of the laws of physics, would appear the same to someone on the deck of a ship moving smoothly and uniformly through the water as a person standing on land.
(A) water as a
(B) water as to a
(C) water; just as it would to a
(D) water, as it would to the
(E) water; just as to the
答案是B,没有省略to.


又如


79. George Sand (Aurore Lucile Dupin) was one of the first European writers to consider the rural poor to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these with sympathy and respect in her novels.




  1. to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these
  2. should be legitimate subjects for literature: portray these


  3. as being legitimate subjects for literature an portraying them


  4. as if they were legitimate subjects for literal; and portray them


  5. legitimate subjects for literature and to portray them

答案是E也没有省略。


怎么省略介词有规律吗?

15#
发表于 2005-5-26 08:59:00 | 只看该作者
16#
发表于 2005-5-26 21:46:00 | 只看该作者
很有收获,谢谢!我再到那里讨论讨论。
17#
发表于 2005-5-27 03:45:00 | 只看该作者

enough to v.(affect...) and v.(induce)


考的是并列,看见出现的动宾搭配多了,就应该想想是不是要考并列了。


愚见!

18#
发表于 2006-1-8 16:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用billion在2005-2-14 9:57:00的发言:


1. displays...can heat...enough to affect, induce... (induce 与heat 并列)
2. displays...can heat...enough to affect, and induce (induce 与 heat并列)
3. displays...can heat...enough to affect and induce (induce 与 affect并列)


根据逻辑意思判断,induce应该与affect并列,选E


b选项中,og说B produces an illogical and ungrammatical statement by making induce parallel with the verb heat rather than with the appropriate form of the verb affect;


为什么在,的后面用动词原型就是与heat平行?


逗号可以表并列?类似于separate,required course 就是og37的那题?


19#
发表于 2006-1-8 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

Displays ... can heat...enough to X and Y


enough to是表结果的集中用法之一,如so...that, such...that, so as to, enough to,我记得LZM提到enough to表达的是一种主观,so as to用于简单的系表结构


不知道清楚否?

20#
发表于 2006-11-23 22:15:00 | 只看该作者
想问一下, 为什么要表达(induce与here)并列要写成:
displays...can heat ...enough to affect, and induce?

是不是因为如果不加逗号会产生歧义??
但是有的时候不是需要通过逻辑意思来判断吗?

不懂。。。请大牛讲讲。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-4 04:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部