ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1666|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-1 GMAT中经常考的知识点-ing修饰 头疼

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-13 00:44:00 | 只看该作者

OG12-1 GMAT中经常考的知识点-ing修饰 头疼

The Glass House Mountains in Queensland, Australia, were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook,
 
by whom they were named supposedly because its
sheer wet rocks glistered like glass.

C. Naming them supposedly since their
D. Who so named them supposedly because their

答案: D

OG解释:as the object of a preposition and not the subject of the clause, James Cook does not work as the noun that the verbal phase beginning with naming can describe.

白勇语法中说,主语+谓语+宾语(或介宾),+ing, ing可修饰主语,也可修饰句尾的宾语或介词的宾语   为什么这里不能修饰修饰 James Cook

1.        Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(A) Reared apart from each other, a recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(B) Reared apart from each other, striking similarities between identical twins that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior were shown in a recent United States study.

(C) A recent United States study showed striking similarities in identical twins reared apart from each other that include many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

(D) According to a recent United States study, identical twins reared apart from each other showed striking similarities, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.D

(E) According to a recent United States study, identical twins showed striking similarities reared apart from each other, including many idiosyncrasies of behavior.

此题答案为D, 如果按照og12的说法, including 应该修饰的是identical twins, 但是这里修饰的是similarities ,也就是ing可以修饰其近前的名词。

主语+谓语+宾语(或介宾),+ing, 这个ing到底是个怎么修饰法?


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/13 1:11:22编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-9-14 01:49:00 | 只看该作者
同问!!~可是这里similarities不是某个介词的宾语耶。。。难道这就是区别?!~
板凳
发表于 2009-9-14 03:12:00 | 只看该作者
还是以OG为准吧。。我也刚刚总结了这道题
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 06:09:00 | 只看该作者

放在一个完整句子逗号后的分词的修饰, 我经常不清楚其修饰对象, 因为他既能做状语(修饰句子主语),又能做定语(修饰其近前的名词),这就是我为什么分不清的原因

5#
发表于 2009-9-21 15:34:00 | 只看该作者
UPUP!!~
6#
发表于 2009-9-21 16:37:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用caopp在2009/9/16 6:09:00的发言:

放在一个完整句子逗号后的分词的修饰, 我经常不清楚其修饰对象, 因为他既能做状语(修饰句子主语),又能做定语(修饰其近前的名词),这就是我为什么分不清的原因

同感 ,同问
7#
发表于 2009-9-30 20:59:00 | 只看该作者
顶顶!!同问~~
8#
发表于 2009-9-30 22:39:00 | 只看该作者

我好像也没搞清楚这个东西 但是一般这种题也都做对

,ing除了including 其他我都是看做伴随的……

我是觉得ing修饰前面的名词的时候比较少加逗号

希望有NN解答下咯

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 01:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部