ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1817|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1-239

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-4 12:39:00 | 只看该作者

prep1-239

239.
            
(28502-!-item-!-188;#058&003082)     

 

Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core, instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse

A. instead its own weight would cause a star to collapse

B. instead a star would have collapsed under its own weight

C. a star would have to be collapsing under its own weight

D. a star would collapse under its own weight

E. its own weight would have caused a star’s collapse

请问E有什么错?its不是指star吗?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-6 11:59:00 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
发表于 2009-9-6 12:25:00 | 只看该作者
Were it not for the fusion-powered heat and radiation that rush from its core,  its own weight would have caused a star's collapse.
这个句子如果是这样的,确实让人难以理解it是指代什么,我会觉得是能够使star瓦解的某样东西(比如元气弹)。
地板
发表于 2009-9-6 12:38:00 | 只看该作者
个人认为好的形势应该是代词指代前面出现过的名词。
5#
发表于 2009-9-6 13:14:00 | 只看该作者

E是过去时的虚拟吧 感觉像是特指某个star

这句话里it做什么成份?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 12:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部