ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1656|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]关于12th OG的几个问题!!请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-10 12:22:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]关于12th OG的几个问题!!请教


感谢大家的话就写在回帖之后了..这里就直接贴题目了...

61.Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement,the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang,China'first emperor,in his afterlife is more than 2000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.

A.the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang,China'first emperor,in his afterlife is more than 2000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.

B.Qin Shi Huang,China's first emperor,was protected in his afterlife by an army of terra-cotta warriors that was created more than 2000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it

C. It took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang,China's first emperor,in his afterlife

D.more than 2,000 years ago,700,000artisans worked more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to ptotect Qin Shi Huang,China's first emperor,in his afterlife

E. more than 36 years were needed to  complete the army of tera-cotta warriors that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi Huang,China's first emperor,in his afterlife

我一直执着的觉得B才是正确答案..虽然有点不够简洁,但是我觉得其他选项都不正确...尤其是原文,AND前后我觉得根本就不平行啊.而其他的选项,比如说C ,OG给的解释是: opening  phrase is adangling modifier because it does not describe the subject it; the sequence of information presented is confusing and unclear.红色部分给的解释其他选项也类似,可是我没太看明白这个解释是什么意思?..请教高手了...

57.That educators have not anticipate the impact of microcomputer techonology can hardly be said that it is their fault:"Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock ,published in 1970.

A That educators have not anticipate the impact of microcomputer techonology can hardly be said that it is their fault

B That educators have not anticipate the impact of microcomputer techonology can hardly be said to be at fault

C  It can hardly be said that  it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer techonology

D It can hardly be said that educators are  at fault  for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer techonology

E选项有明显的错误,就不敲了..

我想请问的是关于A B的解释:A .Inverting the usual order results in an ungrammatical constructiong in which the main verb is both preceded and followed by a subordinate clause.红色部分的解释不太明白,我觉得这个结构好像没有什么错误呀?

B.can hardly be said to be at fault does not grammatically complete the subordinat clause.为什么does not grammatically complete the subordinat clause?没有理解这个逻辑?请求赐教..另外个人觉得C应该是正确答案,可是OG的解释是  that it is...who have not is  also distrts meaning and lacks completion.发现自己无法理解为什么连续几个解释都提到了does not complete the subordinate clause.下面这个题目也是同样的问题,希望能解释一下,谢谢~

50.According to some analysts,the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the ecnomy will aboid the recession that many had feared darilier in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing" followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

B in the economy to aboid the recession ,what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come

C in the economy's ability to avoid the recession ,something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come

OG给的解释是B: rather to come does not complete the second part of the sentence idiomatically,好多题目都是这个解释啊,谁能解释一下,谢谢了啊~

C. instead to come
            
does not complete the second part of the sentence idiomatically
,也是和上面同样的问题..救命了...

最后还有一个时态的问题想请教

48. In 1713, Alexande Pope began his translation of the lliad,a work that ,taking him seven years until completion,and that literary critic Samuel Johnson,Pope's contemporary ,pronounced he greatest translation in any language.

正确选项是:  his translation of the lliad,a work that took him seven years to  completion and that literary critic Samuel Johnson,Pope's contemporary ,pronounced

为什么这里不用过去完成时: a work that had taken?

谢谢各位的帮助!~~在下不胜感激了~~!

沙发
发表于 2009-8-10 15:29:00 | 只看该作者

我只是说说自己的看法哦,MM辩证的看我的解释吧。

61。Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt ,只有the army of terra-cotta warriors 可以做其逻辑主语,意思即兵马俑可以与金字塔媲美。B中的秦始皇做主语,不符合逻辑。

57.can hardly be said 是main verb,og前后说前后都有从句不符合语法,我的确也没见过这样的。C的话只强调了it is the fault of educators 而他们不该被责备的内容变成修饰成分在who引导的从句中,我觉得改意。

48.a work 指代 translation ,如果用过去完成时,就变成开始translation的时候,这个work已经完成了,不对。

50 的后半部分怎么排除我一直没有想明白,但是rather后的to一般是省略的。

解释不清见谅啦,等nn们给你解答吧

板凳
发表于 2009-8-10 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

我想针对LZ的57题说一下俺的愚见哈~~~

就是那个C选项,that后面跟的从句一定要有完整的主谓结构。可是C选项中,that后面是it is the fault of educators who have ...

这里it是形式主语,真正的主语应该在句子的后面要出现。可是c选项里面,is是谓语,the fault of ...整一段都是宾语。那这个从句就相当于没有了主语了。所以解释里说does not complete the subordinate clause

不知道这样解释能不能说服你?~~呵呵~~~

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-11 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

oh ,I got it.

谢谢啦~

我开始还去查了形式主语的用法..以为这个句子少了后面的主语是意思上的不完整,看来it作形式主语的时候缺少真正的主语句子还是不完整滴~

万分感谢!~~~

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-11 14:39:00 | 只看该作者

再说一下下....

这个选项也改变了原句的意思啦

原句说不能因为educators没有参加就说这是他们的fault,而这个选项中说成了这不是那些没有参加活动的educators的fault....

无论如何这个选项还是要枪毙咯~~

3Q~~

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-11 15:48:00 | 只看该作者

57题C这个选项也改变了原句的意思啦

原句的意思是很难说因为educators没有参加就说这是他们的fault,而这个选项中说成了这不是那些没有参加活动的educators的fault....就是这样改变了句子的意思了...

关于57的AB选项,我觉得是不是因为that...can be said已经是一个完整的句子了(只不过是被动语态),所以后面无论是加一个从句还是to be at fault 都没有作成分,因此是错误的?.....不知道这样理解合理不?

61题的解释终于看懂了,的确如你所说,除了A以外的其它选项都和金字塔不对等....不过我还有一个小问题..就是前面那个rivaling的句子作什么成分?

48题的时态,我仔细看了OG的解释,所有选项它都没有提到时态错误的问题,不过我还是赞成你的解释~~

关于50题,看OG又看了几遍,得出的解释是:原文的意思是economy(主语)
        will avoid the recession and come in for a "soft landing" 而B、C中come in 的主语变成了growing confidence,也就是说B:the gains reflect growing confidence(in....),rather to come..其中括号的东西都是作状语修饰growing confidence的,所以come 的主语改变了.

C同B,and之前的句子为the gains refect growing confidence (in..),那么and 之后的句子完整的应该是growing confidence instead to come...

因此第二部分的意思不正确了。个人理解,不知道你觉得是否正确?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-1 21:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部