请教issue思路,要考了...急啊

figoliuxi

Version1
No art exhibition or public performance should be cancelled because of the
community's objection to its content.（未找到）

    

Version2
        Art exhibition and public performance should not be
cancelled because of a community's objection to its content
                

确实不知道该怎么入手,大家帮忙啊

figoliuxi

没人嘛??顶一下阿

maggieah

从网上考了点东西，你看看有没有思路

Protests by private organizations or individuals, offended either by the presentation of art or the mere fact of its existence, often prove to be the most disruptive challenge. Even when the artist has the support of the presenter, local government officials, and the majority of the community, offended and organized individuals can effectively disrupt an exhibition or performance. Tactics range from staged demonstrations to extensive media campaigns and organized boycotts of the presentation and its financial backers.

Challenges to artistic freedom often come from organized segments of what has become known as the “religious right.” Most of the well-known national organizations, such as the Christian Coalition, the American Family Association, and Focus on the Family, have local chapters that may actively monitor art in your community. Some conservative church and parents organizations may also devote energy and financial resources to challenging artistic freedom.

But such challenges do not originate exclusively from the right side of the political spectrum. Some organizations and individuals identifying with the left are also active proponents of restraints on artistic freedom. For example, certain artwork dealing with race or ethnicity has been characterized as hate speech by some civil rights organizations, and some women’s rights activists have spoken out against art that depicts women in sexual situations.