ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rosemary628
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-26-20

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-10-24 23:29:13 | 只看该作者
那么过去完成时怎么解释呢。。
-- by 会员 KIMMI0330 (2010/10/24 23:18:21)



这个问题自己想明白了。。
有个问题:compared with的用法。A(这个地方一定要是直接参与比较的内容麽? 比如说这道题目里与figure比较的数据离comma比较远)。 ,compared with B
期待NN回答~
12#
发表于 2010-12-1 19:06:21 | 只看该作者
到底是什么呢?
13#
发表于 2011-7-18 11:56:11 | 只看该作者
那么过去完成时怎么解释呢。。
-- by 会员 KIMMI0330 (2010/10/24 23:18:21)


同问
14#
发表于 2011-7-20 17:11:01 | 只看该作者
In 1981 children in the United States spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week1997年的已经不是1981年的那帮孩子了,不能用they

B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week这里用的是分号. 而不是主句从句关系. 所以两个句子是有逻辑关系的平行. 1997 并不是过去(1981) 的将来. 既然是平行概念1997 & 1981 都是现在的过去. by ....时间的意思. 所以发生在1997的过去. 有就是和1981的过去是平行概念的过去. 所以had grown

C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997逻辑不对,一周6小时,这是一个频率,不能were spent

D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997
15#
发表于 2011-7-31 20:41:50 | 只看该作者
只要是强调过去一段时间存在动作 后来又消失了 就可以用过去完成时
16#
发表于 2011-8-11 10:35:37 | 只看该作者

再问GWD26-Q20

In 1981 children in the United States spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week

B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week

C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997

D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997
开始选的C,知道了被动不如主动,可是C中的过去完成时的标志是什么?是by吗?
17#
发表于 2012-1-31 20:07:28 | 只看该作者
D
-- by 会员 xiaoniuren (2009/8/3 21:17:00)



D 选项确实错在a figure of  nearly six hours a week 这个表达上,一是表达不idiomatic, 二是啰嗦,应该把a figure of 去掉改成  nearly six hours a week 这样就对了而且nearly six hours 与上文slightly less than two and half hours 对称。

18#
发表于 2012-2-7 17:51:41 | 只看该作者
In 1981 children in the United States spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week. 1997年之前孩子spent nearly six hours a week 不能代表他们1997年也这么做。

B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week

C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997  主动被动不平行,且被动的话谁发出的呢?

D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997 compared像跟chores compared.

E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997 that 前面加逗号不能直接修饰前面的noun或者phrases,要加and,或者换同位语从句也行。
19#
发表于 2012-5-3 15:30:00 | 只看该作者
In 1981 children in the United States spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.



A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week1997年的已经不是1981年的那帮孩子了,不能用they



B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week这里用的是分号. 而不是主句从句关系. 所以两个句子是有逻辑关系的平行. 1997 并不是过去(1981) 的将来. 既然是平行概念1997 & 1981 都是现在的过去. by ....时间的意思. 所以发生在1997的过去. 有就是和1981的过去是平行概念的过去. 所以had grown
解释得真好~~~




C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997逻辑不对,一周6小时,这是一个频率,不能were spent



D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997



E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997


-- by 会员 letao531 (2011/7/20 17:11:01)

20#
发表于 2013-7-2 00:07:13 | 只看该作者
众NN解释犀利,受教了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-14 07:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部