ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place: one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 8240|回复: 20
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og200

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-28 09:22:00 | 只看该作者

og200

200. Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place: one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.fficeffice" />


(A) Certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place; one reason is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.


(B) If used repeatedly in the same place, one reason that certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals.


(C) If used repeatedly in the same place, one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective is suggested by the finding that much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes are found in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than those that are free of such chemicals.


(D) The finding that there are much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in soils that are free of such chemicals is suggestive of one reason, if used repeatedly in the same place, certain pesticides can become ineffective.A


(E) The finding of much larger populations of pesticide-degrading microbes in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use than in those that are free of such chemicals suggests one reason certain pesticides can become ineffective if used repeatedly in the same place.


    


答案是a, 但是我觉得结构上不平行:there are much larger populations ....in soils with ...than in soils that..... than 后应该补出代词those 指代population 才对呀?请指教。

沙发
发表于 2004-2-28 10:38:00 | 只看该作者
不需要补出


A中比较的是状语


in soils with a relatively long history of pesticide use    和 in soils that are free of such chemicals.fficeffice" />


在than后there are...可以省略,因为相同。


板凳
发表于 2004-5-26 14:22:00 | 只看该作者
比较的是populations吧?
地板
发表于 2004-5-26 18:06:00 | 只看该作者

比较的是populations,但than后可以省去those

5#
发表于 2004-5-27 15:16:00 | 只看该作者
请教those和that指代有什么区别?
6#
发表于 2004-5-27 15:21:00 | 只看该作者
一个单数一个复述
7#
发表于 2004-5-27 15:23:00 | 只看该作者
要补也不是补that those而是补there are
8#
发表于 2004-5-27 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

populations in soils are more than those in


这个时候才补those


我就举这个两个例子了


大家体会体会


再举一个


owing and living in a  house is still goal as it is ....


it 指代owing and living in a house


要再举还有很多


不知道大家看出问题来了没


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-27 15:27:17编辑过]
9#
发表于 2004-5-28 04:45:00 | 只看该作者

多谢gigi,继续请教:

og:

In choice E, The finding of much larger populations .. . than in those that is an improperly constructed comparison.

笨鸟:

1.      正确选项中为什么比较的时候后边还用in soils 而不用those? 因为这样更清楚,避免了代词指带的不清楚。

可是e中those前有in和in soils 平行,怎么会指代不清呢?

10#
发表于 2004-7-23 15:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用绿水长流在2004-5-28 4:45:00的发言:

多谢gigi,继续请教:


og:


In choice E, The finding of much larger populations .. . than in those that is an improperly constructed comparison.


笨鸟:


1.      正确选项中为什么比较的时候后边还用in soils 而不用those? 因为这样更清楚,避免了代词指带的不清楚。


可是e中those前有in和in soils 平行,怎么会指代不清呢?



问题同上!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 23:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部