GWD1-Q41

lanyuatbard

    

Leaching, the recovery of
copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of
minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but
until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active
part in the process.

    

 

    

A.     
as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established

    

B.      
as a method of the extraction of minerals well established

    

C.     
was a well-established method of mineral extraction

    

D.     
was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was

    

E.      
had been a method of mineral extraction, well established

我在E和C之间纠结 为什么不选E 过去完成时呢 谢谢

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-9 9:17:34编辑过]

imharper

因为题目逻辑意思没有明确指示这个MINERAL EXTRACTION并没有在过去某个时间段就停止了,题目只是说25年前才知道原来是习惯在这过程中担当了重要作用,并没说这种MINERAL EXTRACTION停止了.

根据文章的逻辑意思,这种方法很有可能现在还在使用

所以E不对

lanyuatbard

谢谢了 嘿嘿

Powellyao

ding

fiona_hq

up~

abbyabby

弱问~~~

    LZ这个GWD是哪个版本的？是GWD-TN24嘛？还是？。。。。

Jmelon

回LS，是TN24。另想问下D选项错在哪了？

joymoon

以下是引用Jmelon在2009/8/1 13:04:00的发言：

回LS，是TN24。另想问下D选项错在哪了？

个人觉得as early as the eighteenth century是修饰整个主句动词发生的但D中变成修饰后面名词，而且有指代不清的嫌疑，是method 呢还是mineral呢？

E中完成时态不好，but 后的句子才一般过去时那还是25年前，发生在前半句时间的后面。而且感觉well established as early as the eighteenth century后置修饰对象比较模糊，意思也有变

Jmelon

以下是引用joymoon在2009/8/1 13:25:00的发言：

个人觉得as early as the eighteenth century是修饰整个主句动词发生的但D中变成修饰后面名词，而且有指代不清的嫌疑，是method 呢还是mineral呢？

E中完成时态不好，but 后的句子才一般过去时那还是25年前，发生在前半句时间的后面。而且感觉well established as early as the eighteenth century后置修饰对象比较模糊，意思也有变

哦~有道理 THX

wg5702zy

关于这道题，我想问一下B选项错在哪里了，我选择的是B，是不是因为well established修饰的比较混乱，所以不选这个，如果是因为这个原因，那如果well estabilished 的修饰没有引起歧义，这里能用as引导吗？