ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 34285|回复: 56
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]新prep2,210

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-6-4 21:49:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]新prep2,210

210.       (29708-!-item-!-188;#058&004436)       (GWD-12-Q31)

 

Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

给说说A哪错了。。。outnumbering分句表主句结果,不行么?我觉得逻辑上也说的通啊。。。

沙发
发表于 2009-6-5 03:28:00 | 只看该作者
有人說邏輯上"outnumbering..."不能是"Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written"隨伴(結果)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-6-5 17:13:00 | 只看该作者
那也只能这么理解了。。。看来版主也不认为有别的毛病了。。。。
地板
发表于 2009-9-24 01:00:00 | 只看该作者
我也有同样的问题~顶!
5#
发表于 2009-10-15 20:45:00 | 只看该作者

我选了A

因为觉得E的话,觉得应该是outnumbered

6#
发表于 2009-10-15 21:17:00 | 只看该作者
个人观点,gmac越来越注重语法当中的逻辑了,我觉得如果选e的话这句句子的重点在后面半句,就是letters outnumber letters.
不过话说回来我第一次看到这题的话也肯定选a,逗号后面which一般就近修饰的,在这句中有歧义……
7#
发表于 2009-11-9 20:19:34 | 只看该作者
大家不觉得那个E的which不对吗?
which不是只能修饰它之前的名词吗?
虽然我知道之前是个人,which不能修饰人
但是难道就因为这样所以which可以跳跃修饰?
8#
发表于 2009-11-18 22:10:43 | 只看该作者
哦,原来这道题这么多人都选了A……我真是不明白了,GMAT这些语法点的用法怎么这么没原则。OG里面那么多都是一看which不跟着修饰词,就给派出了……这道题……我真是看着E更好,真是不敢选。就是觉得which不对……
9#
发表于 2009-12-14 16:21:18 | 只看该作者
NND,越来越考逻辑了,A只强调了信在哪个时间段写,没有强调写了多少。所以outnumbering无法构成主句结果,因为主句里面没有提到写了多少多少信。如果主句提到这个阶段写写多少信,A肯定对了。
10#
发表于 2009-12-14 22:18:37 | 只看该作者
大家不觉得那个E的which不对吗?
which不是只能修饰它之前的名词吗?
虽然我知道之前是个人,which不能修饰人
但是难道就因为这样所以which可以跳跃修饰?
-- by 会员 doyoga (2009/11/9 20:19:34)

which 不是只能修饰名词的,在非限定性从句中which可用来修饰整个句子

eg.He broke the expensive vase,which made her mother very angry.

在这里是他打碎了花瓶使她妈妈非常生气,而不是花瓶让他妈妈生气。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-21 00:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部