ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 31065|回复: 55
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD3-Q22:

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-4-21 18:14:00 | 只看该作者

GWD3-Q22:

On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.

A.      On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold

B.       With a law passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold

C.      A law passed in 1933 that made it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen holding

D.      Because of a law passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

E.       Due to a law being passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

答案是D我选错了,后来能够理解为什么我错了,可是理解不了为什么D是正确的?

希望牛牛们给分析一下,选择D的成分,以及为什么?

沙发
发表于 2009-4-28 17:27:00 | 只看该作者
同样等待结果 请帮忙解决,谢谢
板凳
发表于 2009-5-5 19:49:00 | 只看该作者

我是这样想的,先看最后,for a US citizen to do,所以就剩下DE

E 中 law being passed不对,law怎么可以被持续的pass呢

地板
发表于 2009-5-5 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

1933年的通过的法律为什么还要being?

passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

passed and making 都是修饰law, 而it是形式宾语

不知道这样的理解是否正确

5#
发表于 2009-5-12 15:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kingwangfei在2009-5-5 22:45:00的发言:

1933年的通过的法律为什么还要being?

passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold

passed and making 都是修饰law, 而it是形式宾语

不知道这样的理解是否正确

it是形式主语,指代for a United States citizen to hold。

6#
发表于 2009-5-12 15:37:00 | 只看该作者

问ISI,  B选项为什么错,  是因为后面 THAT从句 不如 for TO 简洁吗, 还是前面 WITH 的问题

很少看见 独立主格 对过,  是不是本身这个形式就不好

7#
发表于 2009-5-13 00:19:00 | 只看该作者
B中的with修錯誤
8#
发表于 2009-5-13 14:11:00 | 只看该作者
but why ?  with a law passed  这句话不对么, 后面的 THAT是修LAW 的 , 哪里欠妥?
9#
发表于 2009-5-13 15:10:00 | 只看该作者
B中的第一个that也不对..
10#
发表于 2009-5-13 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

怎么不对, law passed in 1943 that , 当然是理解成that 修饰law 了, 不然that还能加在哪?? 紧贴着law不成?

正确答案D making 也是一样的道理啊, 不能理解修饰1943

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-20 10:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部