ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1670|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

a question from 987-692

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-22 02:07:00 | 只看该作者

a question from 987-692

1.       
The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she
suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with
no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
.

    

(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually
promoting


    

(B) quota, having no commitment to
minority hiring and eventually promoting


    

(C) quota and did not reflect a
commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion


    

(D) quota, not reflecting a
commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotionC


    

(E) quota, not one that reflected
that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment


The answer should be C. I got A, the explanation is minority hiring and eventually
promoting
don't paralleled each other.Is it bc minority hiring is n+ving and eventually promoting is adv+ving?
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-22 2:12:10编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-3-22 02:20:00 | 只看该作者
Is it an OG explanation?  I doubt it tho.
板凳
发表于 2009-3-22 03:33:00 | 只看该作者
promoting有名词形式promotion就不能用promoting来表达名词形式。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-22 04:56:00 | 只看该作者
thanks shuxuehai
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 14:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部