ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7637|回复: 23
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教新prep2-163, 没有讨论过

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-27 17:38:00 | 只看该作者

请教新prep2-163, 没有讨论过

163.    (27788-!-item-!-188;#058&002611)

Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
A. Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
B. Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
C. Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
D. Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
E. Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

答案b

请问c的错误在哪里?不能理解成stimulat修饰前面这个句子吗?nn帮忙指点指点,谢了

沙发
发表于 2009-2-27 17:49:00 | 只看该作者

非NN

C的错误应该比较明显,从整句来看前面有even表示让步,后面也要相对应句子,需是完整的句子前后对应。

从逻辑上看,stimulat是修饰new maritime code的,不是修饰前面整个句子的。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-27 18:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用balabaladou7在2009-2-27 17:49:00的发言:

非NN

C的错误应该比较明显,从整句来看前面有even表示让步,后面也要相对应句子,需是完整的句子前后对应。

从逻辑上看,stimulat是修饰new maritime code的,不是修饰前面整个句子的。

EVEN确实是个很大的问题,我忽略了。
但从逻辑上来说,“在这个法案中,这些小岛都能如何如何,这件事激发了国际舆论“ 好像是说的通的列
让我再想想


谢谢ls mm
地板
发表于 2009-3-24 19:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用snowlemon在2009-2-27 17:38:00的发言:
163.    (27788-!-item-!-188;#058&002611)

Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
A. Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated这里的they指代了the provisions原来是语意重复code都用了就不用说provisions of the new maritime code 直接说code的内容就好了
B. Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it has already stimulated
C. Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating错在现在完成时改成现在分词 现在分词强调的是动作与被修饰逻主同时发生 一般情况下动词过去时和完成时都不要改成doing 另外原本的主句被改成了修饰成分 句子重心变了 也不对
D. Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated错在this
E. Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating错在which 一个是指代了全句错 一个是句子重心变了错

答案b

请问c的错误在哪里?不能理解成stimulat修饰前面这个句子吗?nn帮忙指点指点,谢了

大家看看我这样分析对不对?尤其是A  大家觉得错在哪里了?

5#
发表于 2009-3-24 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

顶起来!!!大家快来讨论!!!

各位NN和版主aeo和AlienX快现身吧!!!

6#
发表于 2009-3-25 11:36:00 | 只看该作者
再问A选项的provisions与code是否语意重复使用???
7#
发表于 2009-3-25 11:49:00 | 只看该作者

不重复 一个是code 一个是code里的条例

A ---Because there are provisions , they have already stimulated
逻辑上是不通顺的,再一个there be强调自然拥有

C后面应该加句子

8#
发表于 2009-3-25 12:14:00 | 只看该作者

我怎么觉得错不在there are啊...

现在看觉得是they指代了provisions错

貌似:因为code中有如此的provisions,此code引起了disputes,而不应该是they指代provisions引起disputes

不明白啊!!!

9#
发表于 2009-3-25 12:17:00 | 只看该作者

Because there are provisions , they have already stimulated 我是说这个逻辑不对 你试着翻译下 因为有provision 他们stimulated...

吃饭去先

10#
发表于 2009-3-25 12:26:00 | 只看该作者

A选项的主要问题是they指代不清。

前面的那么多复数都可以是they的语法指代对象,而逻辑对象却是code,应该是单数。

PS:fighting127MM的字非常小,以至于我很难看清,不知是怎么回事。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部