ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: cannedpineapple
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[校友答疑] Ask Jason@沃顿 (closed)

[精华] [复制链接]
101#
发表于 2009-3-4 10:13:00 | 只看该作者
实在是大大感谢Jason大好人啊!!!
另外小问题一则:不知道Wharton选择宣讲的公司是不是相比较其他公司会有雇员申请上的优势呢?
many thx~~

102#
发表于 2009-3-4 11:35:00 | 只看该作者

"A bad score will hurt you, but a good score doesn't help."

那么可以理解为:面试是用来往下筛人的.譬如进入面试的人都设为60分,只要得了个"负"分的就都被筛掉.而得"正"分的,65和95都没什么区别.

103#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-4 13:23:00 | 只看该作者
withmoon> No, there is no benefit. The speaker series is run by students; admissions decisions are made by the admissions committee. These are entirely separate departments with no interaction.

pega09> A bad interview does not mean that you are automatically dinged either. Someone could be sick that day, or simply just have performed poorly. Wharton understands that, which is why the school views the application in its entirety. If everything else in your application indicates that you're an amazing communicator who just may have had a poor day, then even with a bad interview you may still be accepted. As for the difference between 65 and 95, well, I might have exaggerated its similarity to the GMAT. In fact for the GMAT it is true that 720 and 780 are not very different. For an interview, however, if the half-hour convinces your interviewer that you are a not-to-be-missed candidate (ie typically shows you have great charisma, charm and communication skills, which themselves are important and rare skills that typically make the difference between 65 (merely right answers) and 95 (fantastic communicator)), then that too will help your candidacy. The thing is, however, extremely few people will get the 95, so I would say that 95% of applicants to Wharton get in with a score of 65 or below on the interview (using your scoring matrix..)
104#
发表于 2009-3-4 14:02:00 | 只看该作者

Jason你实在是太负责了!感谢!

105#
发表于 2009-3-4 14:46:00 | 只看该作者

Jason还在吗?

两个小问题:

1,录取委员会会认真考量申请材料中除了Essay, Recommendation letters等大头之外的那些由申请者填写的部分吗? 譬如对大学时课外活动的描述,对工作后社会活动的描述,有啥爱好其中最喜欢的是什么等等.就是申请材料PDF中处于Essay前半部分的内容. 或者这些内容仅仅是一个材料备份?

2,我约面试的时候系统要我重新上传简历,但后来面试官又向我要简历:貌似系统并没把简历转给他.我上传的简历相对我申请材料中的简历微调了一下内容,因为毕竟距离申请提交已经过去了2个月.请问录取委员会是看以前的那份还是看最近update后的简历呢?

106#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-5 00:54:00 | 只看该作者
pega09>
1. They do look at it, but I wouldn't spend too long on this. I personally just took a few hours to fill it in.

2. They will look at the updated resume. However I wouldn't worry about this either. The resume is not quite as important as the other parts of the application. In fact, when I applied last year, I did not submit a resume.

Hope your interview went well!
107#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-5 11:30:00 | 只看该作者
Stumbled across some useful replies from Wharton adcom on the interview:

Question: "What are some of
the differences between an applicant chosen after the interview and one
denied, besides someone not being well-versed on their own application
information submitted?"

Answers from Kathryn Bezella: "The interview is meant to give us a sense of how you
communicate in person. It helps us see how you listen and respond
thoughtfully to questions about your work experiences, and it also
allows us a greater sense of your personality. Usually the IV would not
be the single factor that would keep you from gaining admission to
Wharton - it is still only one of many aspects that we would be
evaluating, so someone denied post IV most likely still has other
"holes" or areas that needed improvement in their application."

"We make sure the interviews are blind in order to keep the
interviewer's mind open. We wouldn't want to bias them based on your
undergrad record or that essay you may have decided to write at the
last minute. Blind IV's allow us to meet YOU, and not just your file."


Answer from Ainsley Parker: "Because the interviewers won't have seen your application, everything
you talk about will be new for them. Certainly things that you
speak about in your essays are meaningful, but it's up to you as to
whether or not you discuss them."

Question: "Could you please describe the process you go through to decide whether
to invite an applicant for interview or not? Do you waitlist an
applicant before or after the interview?"

Answer from Judith Hodara: "We read all of the files carefully and assess if we would like
more information on the candidate; or we are interested to learn more.
We would waitlist only after the interview."

Question: "If you are interviewing an applicant and the numbers and basic profile
of their application is in the ballpark for a Wharton student, what
distinguishes an applicant that you recommend for acceptance from one
that you recommend for denial?"

Answer from Judith Hodara: "We are looking very closely for the sense of self; how well can a
student articulate where they are on their path and where they would
like to go? How well do they know themselves, and how reflective can
they be about this stage in their professional and personal lives?
About 90% of those who apply are academically in the ballpark. The rest
is individualism."
108#
发表于 2009-3-5 15:42:00 | 只看该作者

非常感谢并钦佩Jason

109#
发表于 2009-3-5 22:15:00 | 只看该作者

Jason, what about the internship of 10wharton and full time offer of 11wharton?

Frankly, job offers really matter. Esp in this awful market.

110#
发表于 2009-3-5 23:01:00 | 只看该作者
Jason,根据以前的校友答疑,贵校每年录取大陆学生约30+-2人的样子,去年也是这样吗?有信息显示贵校也存在录取的“大小年”,是这样的吗?据说韩国学生也有30多人,按人口比例来算,似乎不太公平。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:


近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 08:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部