ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: maimai2009
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[mm讨论]新prep2-159

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2009-3-6 17:05:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用fightbear在2009-2-20 17:09:00的发言:
98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country和98 percent of men and 75 percent of women who were born in the country意思一样的,但是98 percent of men and 75 percent of women, who were born in the country,是插入语,who就近修饰women

不太同意。个人认为,

percent说明应该是单数,因此加了were就修饰men and women;

没有who were的就应该是就近修饰women,而不包括men;

但是其实应该是指出生在那个国家的所有人,应该都包括的。

不太理解。

12#
发表于 2009-3-6 17:08:00 | 只看该作者

后来接受是基于忠实于原文的原则,但是逻辑上似乎有点奇怪。

13#
发表于 2009-5-25 14:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cynthiak在2009-3-6 17:05:00的发言:

不太同意。个人认为,

percent说明应该是单数,因此加了were就修饰men and women;

没有who were的就应该是就近修饰women,而不包括men;

但是其实应该是指出生在那个国家的所有人,应该都包括的。

不太理解。

百分比的单复数是又of后的内容决定的,这里的用的men和women,肯定是复数
14#
发表于 2009-6-2 19:29:00 | 只看该作者

新东方老师讲过adj+n+and+n那么adj同时修饰两者,否则就是n+and+adj+n

这里同理,若that定语从句只修饰女人,就应该把女人放到and前面,c项就已经证明了是修饰两者。没有任何歧义。

而b项,非限定性定从修饰整体改变原意。再加上reach时态错误,万劫不复,万恶不赦。。。。

15#
发表于 2009-6-3 01:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用maimai2009在2009-1-29 6:11:00的发言:
159.    (26636-!-item-!-188;#058&002003)

The first detailed study of magpie attacks in Australia indicates that (by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds)
A. by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds
B. by the time they reach adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women, who were born in the country, had been attacked by the birds
C. by the time they reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country had been attacked by the birds
D. 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women that were born in the country were attacked by the birds by the time they reach adulthood
E. 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women who were born in the country, by the time they reached adulthood had been attacked by the birds

这道题B和C中,B的who定语从句修饰和C的born分词修饰有什么区别呢?
还有,前面说的是women和men,那么从句和分词修饰的时候为什么不会造成歧义只修饰women或men,而是修饰women和men呢?

一月份问的,现在应该至少考过一次了吧?

有by,考虑过去完成时

A上来就排除,哪儿有by就直接had done的?后面的人怎么办?

Bby这句时态不对,干掉

C很爽

DE真tmd恶心,不分析了吧?

哎,D那个by同B干掉

E的表达方式如同astriction,干掉干掉

扔掉语法吧!哎!

16#
发表于 2009-7-6 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

LS乃牛人

17#
发表于 2009-7-26 10:18:00 | 只看该作者
159我选了D 原因是they 的指代。我觉得they 放在句首很容易让人理解成,是这些男男女女门成年后,而提议应该说是这种鸟,事态确实是个问题,不过C这个语序是不是囧了点...
18#
发表于 2009-7-26 10:19:00 | 只看该作者
19#
发表于 2009-8-11 14:03:00 | 只看该作者

一月份问的,现在应该至少考过一次了吧?

有by,考虑过去完成时

A上来就排除,哪儿有by就直接had done的?后面的人怎么办?

Bby这句时态不对,干掉

C很爽

DE真tmd恶心,不分析了吧?

哎,D那个by同B干掉

E的表达方式如同astriction,干掉干掉

扔掉语法吧!哎!

扔掉语法。。。那你分析的时态是什么东西啊,重意思而轻语法,也不能完全扔啊!

20#
发表于 2009-8-11 21:20:00 | 只看该作者

The first detailed study of magpie attacks in Australia indicates that by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds
A. by the time they had reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country have been attacked by the birds -时态不正确

B. by the time they reach adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women,
who were born in the country, had been attacked by the birds-变成非限定性的了
C. by the time they reached adulthood, 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women born in the country had been attacked by the birds -
???为什么这里的they放在前面,没有意识不明确
D. 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women
that were born in the country were attacked by the birds by the time they reach adulthood - 不能用that修饰人
E. 98 percent of men and 75 percent of women who were born in the country,
by the time they reached adulthood had been attacked by the birds-后面句子混乱

虽然C是最佳答案,但是我对于C中they放在women and men 前面是否指代不清有些搞不清楚?为什么啊?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 21:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部