ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: dreadpower
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全254

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2004-2-21 06:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-2-4 10:52:00的发言:
以下是引用2love2live在2004-2-3    23:42:00的发言:

    对不起,这句不会做,请问如何排除?谢谢    

    E    为什么不对?

    
    


                如果alliances    and    treaties    并列,那么A,C排除,between。。。and用法不成立
                that肯定修饰relation,不可能修饰nation,所以排除D,E,主谓一致


为什么就能排除a,c,呐???alliances and treaties可以是多个国家或政府之间的啊???想不通...字典上特地写了:


relations (phfu复数)relations: official connections between companies, countries, etc......

zenm怎么看都是c啊,虽然我看过答案了...
12#
发表于 2004-2-28 08:38:00 | 只看该作者

大全 243

以下是引用flora_wang在2004-2-21 6:14:00的发言:


为什么就能排除a,c,呐???alliances and treaties可以是多个国家或政府之间的啊???想不通...字典上特地写了:


relations (phfu复数)relations: official connections between companies, countries, etc......

zenm怎么看都是c啊,虽然我看过答案了...



1, I agree. 'relations' has nothing wrong:

relations [plural]



a) official connections between countries, companies, organizations etc

Relations between the two countries have improved recently.



2. I am highly skeptical of the usage of 'relation of A withB'.     does anybody have an example?



relation between

the relation between prices and wages

The price the meat is sold for bears no relation to (=is not connected to) the price the farmer receives.



3, why is C wrong?


13#
发表于 2004-2-28 19:17:00 | 只看该作者
c illustrate紧随nations之后,会造成illustrate修饰nations的错觉,实际上应该修饰relations
14#
发表于 2005-11-9 10:18:00 | 只看该作者
B有一个明显的逻辑错误,relation illustrate肯定不如episode illustrate更合逻辑
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 17:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部