请拍我吧～！

85512ben

又写了几篇，请大家多多指教啊，共同进步！

Nowadays, a hot and ubiquitous controversy concerns whether parents are the best teachers of their children. A fair proportion of people contend that parents always play roles as best teachers. Other people, nevertheless, advocate an oppose view. As far as I am concerned, I side with the latter. Of the countless reasons that can strengthen my viewpoints, I will only present the most conspicuous and consequential ones here.

The first plain truth, I am presenting here, is that although quite a few parents can stand a model of goodness and virtue, they may actually know very limited about how to teach their children in an appropriate way. A good will may incur a bad consequence. As a result, parents may get counterproductive situations. A kid who suffered from too much sermon becomes rebel is a typical instance.

Furthermore, behind my view lies an equally important fact that parents always impose their value and dream on their children despite their own wishes. It is ubiquitous that parents wants to mold their children as perfect as possible. But they ignore the differences between different epoches. In that case, children may forced to do things reluctantly. Such behavior may lead to an unhealthy mental development. Not to mention there are many people don’t deserve to be parents who cast negative effects on their children.

Last but not least, despite their parents, there are still a wide assortment of people can be children’s mentors. Friends, books, society, a myriad of elements can play the role of a good teacher in a child’s life. There are many things that children can not learn from their parents. Let children get experience from different elements lead to a sound growth.

To sum up, it is likely that not merely parents can be their children’s best teachers, as well as other elements either. Leave the right to child of chosing their favourite is the best way to teach.

 

 

 

 Nowadays, there is an ubiquitous change that food has become easier to prepare than ever before. Undeniable, it is not only an improvement in technology but also change people’s life sytle. For the countless reasons that can be cited, I will only present the most consequential and conspicuous ones here.

The first plain truth, I am presenting here, is that people released from trivial preparation to cook, and have more time to spent on thing they really care about. My mother is a typical instance who benefited from these changes. She came home from work with exhausted body, reluctantly to prepare dinner for whole family. Now, the change set her free from all of these. She has more time to do what she want to, and no more complicated cook staff. I would say not merely my mom but many people benefit from this change. They are free from kitchen, and have more opportunities to study, recreation, or communication.

 Furthermore, another equally important factor of this change is that easier to cook makes more people able to cook. Now they can make various kind of food without cooking curriculum. Even a newbie can make themselves an incredible meal, and delighted from it. As far as I am concerned, the change brings more enjoyable into ordinary people’s life.

  Admittedly, despite those advantages that the change bring to us. There are still something we should concerned about. Diseases brought by fast food, families spend less time together before dinner table, and so on. But I believe they are all no match for the improvements which the change bring to us.

In sum up, although everything has two sides, but the benefits in which the change bring to us improved our life style permanently.

 

 

 

Nowadays, a hot and important controversy centering on the ways of getting knowledge concerns whether people should only get knowledge from books. While a fair proportion of people believe that books are the sources of knowledge, other people, argue that we should learn from experience. As far as I am concerned, both of these sources have their two sides. Of the countless facts that support my viewpoint, I will only cite the most conspicuous and consequential ones here.

Admittedly, on the one hand, knowledge from books contain a wide assortment of sources. We can get nearly any aspects of knowledge from books. From geology to recipes, books never failed us. What’s more, compare to others, books are more famous of their profundity. As the facilities of spread knowledge, books concentrate myriad of generations’ wisdom of human being. There are something you don’t need to experience personally, you just learn them from books. Books also advanced at its own mechanism. People can learn from books step by step from the beginning, and need not to worry be straggled. However, sometimes books are so doctrinal that become an obstacle of learning knowledge.

On the other hand, leaning from experience also get its obvious advantages. It is more direct, and more useful. Individuals live and learn simultaneously, the more they go through, the more they learn from life. As we said “No pain, no gain.”, knowledge which people learned from their personal experience are more useful and impressive, and there are even something you can not read from books like how to swim. On the other side, people comprehend their experience form their own situations, what makes it liable to one-sided.

In conclusion, everything has two sides, there is no absolute good or bad. We use different facilities to handle different situations. For us, there is never a best, we should enhance the strong points and avoid the weakness.