ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2361|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

迷惑的逻辑OG NO50 SC

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-31 07:14:00 | 只看该作者

迷惑的逻辑OG NO50 SC

as a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
e) as baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500

自由的疑问是,这个答案在OG中是错误的,可是自由感觉没什么错误,大家能给些意见吗?感激!!!
沙发
发表于 2004-1-31 13:00:00 | 只看该作者
你看E最后 would be rated 的主语是什么?就明白E为什么错。
板凳
发表于 2004-1-31 13:41:00 | 只看该作者
which修饰sense of vision,但是sense of vision不可能是blind,只有人才可能blind

     我觉得这是ETS最恶毒的招数,逻辑意思的不一致,但是比较难察觉

     我也不知道如何应付类似的问题,母语和非母语就显示差别了

     不知道哪位NN有高招吗?
地板
发表于 2004-1-31 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
E:'which would deemed legally blind for an adult' is wrong, it should be 'which would be deemed legally bind for an adult'.
You can't say 'sense of vision' deem..., the subject of deem should be human being or something personated. After all, 'sense of vision' is unable to think, or'deem'.
5#
发表于 2004-1-31 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
E:'which would deemed legally blind for an adult' is wrong, it should be 'which would be deemed legally bind for an adult'.
You can't say 'sense of vision' deem..., the subject of deem should be human being or something personated. After all, 'sense of vision' is unable to think, or'deem'.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-31 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
实在是太谢谢楼上各位高人了!!!自由菜鸟明白了,感激!!!!!!!!!!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 07:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部