ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1674|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep-111

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-12 11:07:00 | 只看该作者

Prep-111

Astronomers have uncovered evidence that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into
view 340,000 years ago, emitting dazzling radiation that could have disrupted Earth's protective
ozone layer and sunburned our Stone Age ancestors.      

(A) that a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
(B) that a star as bright as the full moon exploded into view 340,000 years ago, emitting
(C) of a star that was as bright as the full moon exploding into view 340,000 years ago and that it
emitted
(D) of a star as bright as the full moon, exploding into view 340,000 years ago and emitting
(E) of a star as bright as the full moon that exploded into view 340,000 years ago and that emitted

这道题正确选项为B,但我对这个选项有点疑问,exploded靠着moon,但按照解析,exploded应该修饰的是star,这样不是有歧义么?
还有,我想问个知识点:SvO, doing.这种结构中,doing前如果加了逗号的话,是不是只能作结果状语修饰前面整句话?或者也可以修饰S或O的其中一个对象?比如这道题的emitting有没有可能修饰到star呢?请求NN指点!!
沙发
发表于 2009-7-4 11:04:00 | 只看该作者
ding,我也是不解这个
板凳
发表于 2009-9-6 19:26:00 | 只看该作者

ding

我还想问,emitting会不会造成修饰astronomers的歧义呢?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 11:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部