ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1407|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问 lsat-9-4-12

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-8 18:26:00 | 只看该作者

再问 lsat-9-4-12

12. It is clear that none of the volleyball
players at yesterday’s office beach party came to
work today since everyone who played volleyball
at that party got badly sunburned and no one at
work today is even slightly sunburned.
Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of
reasoning that most closely parallels that in the
argument above?
(A) Since everyone employed by TRF who was given
the opportunity to purchase dental insurance did
so and everyone who purchased dental insurance
saw a dentist, it is clear that no one who failed
to see a dentist is employed by TRF.
(B) Since no one who was promoted during the past
year failed to attend the awards banquet,
evidently none of the office managers attended
the banquet this year since they were all denied
promotion.
(C) Since the Donnely report was not finished on
time, no one in John’s group could have been
assigned to contribute to that report since
everyone in John’s group has a reputation for
getting assignments in on time.
(D) Everyone with an office on the second floor
works directly for the president and, as a
result, no one with a second floor office will
take a July vacation because no one who works for
the president will be able to take time off
during July.
(E) Since all of the people who are now on the
MXM Corporation payroll have been employed in the
same job for the past five years, it is clear
that no one who frequently changes jobs is likely
to be hired by MXM.

KEY D

请问C错在哪里?是因为“has a reputation for

getting assignments in on time”这种表述不严谨吗?只是说明可能性比较大?还是确实结构有问题?

多谢!
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-8 20:44:00 | 只看该作者
顶顶顶
板凳
发表于 2008-9-9 09:23:00 | 只看该作者

题干所展现的逻辑FLAW被称为错误二分法,又叫做"非黑即白"

与它匹配的很容易找到。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-9 09:46:00 | 只看该作者
C为什么不是“非黑即白”?因为reputation只是说明John’s group完成工作的可能性比较大,但是并不能说明肯定都完成?
5#
发表于 2008-9-9 13:21:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT考题有些是考察考生是否能识别逻辑谬误,因此需要在复习时掌握常见的逻辑谬误类型,

这样才不至于在考试时犯晕.

最常见的逻辑谬误大约有25种类型,请自行查找,并体会其表现形式.


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-9 13:22:14编辑过]
6#
发表于 2008-9-11 22:51:00 | 只看该作者
C 的缪误:1偷换概念:有准时的好名声不代表没有延误的时候
                  2.假定没偷换概念:其推理与题干稍差:因为john's-->on time, 所以not on time-->not John's
                     题干:因为volleyball-->sunburn, work-->no sunburn(i.e. sunburn-->no work) 所以 volleyball-->no work.
                     D:Since 2nd floor-->for president, for president--> no vacation, so 2nd floor--> no vacation.
D与题干最接近
7#
发表于 2008-9-25 00:59:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT考题有些是考察考生是否能识别逻辑谬误,因此需要在复习时掌握常见的逻辑谬误类型,

这样才不至于在考试时犯晕.

最常见的逻辑谬误大约有25种类型,请自行查找,并体会其表现形式.

Hello, can you please give me some clue how/where to find out those samples(25种常见的逻辑谬误类型)? Thanks a lot!!!!!

8#
发表于 2008-9-25 22:27:00 | 只看该作者
百度
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 02:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部