大家来看看奇怪的GWD-8-Q20

Zeldaw

以下是引用aeoluseros在2008-10-23 10:39:00的发言：

COOL!! I found an instance to support my idea:

Shoppers in sporting goods stores, unlike in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but they leave with a basketball only.

A. in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, not buying a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but  they leave with a basketball only
B. in department stores, shop impulsively very little; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not also buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well
C. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping, do not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball, but leave with only a basketball 
D. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well
E. department stores,  shop impulsively very little; someone will not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang when they come in for a basketball but will leave with only a basketball

key: D

D里面可以看到will的提前，然后面的leave和buy都成为了动词原形

哇塞，痛快啊

connie4895

以下是引用zhushanyi在2008-9-2 23:01:00的发言：

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 除了语意上面的错误外，其他小错似乎也是有迹可循

 除了语意上面的错误外，其他小错似乎也是有迹可循

1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave
                       consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also (and表对等连接，gave应该和前面的create一样用原形)

2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also (which有错误指代farmland的嫌疑，not only...but also...二边接的对象要符合平衡对称的原则，前面接子句后面也要接子句，但but also后面却少掉了主词)

3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also (but also前面那半句缺少动词) 

4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also (correct)

5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it (but it also后面的这个also代表"也"的意思，是不可省略的)

答案是B，奇怪了WHICH的指代不明吧，IT 也省了，怎么对呢，个人觉得D比较对吧，不清楚，求助NN~~

nerakuhs

TN版的答案是D啊

不过我做的时候 也是光顾着not only but also了 句意都没有好好体会

amumu

在GWD详解里面说：

Note: Guan, Weidong told me that ETS made the question wrong. The answer
should be “A” on the condition of “it but also”.

但是我觉得怎么加个it还是怪怪的，而且gave的问题没有解决啊？

dietywake

B答案在语法结构上没问题，但是逻辑关系上错了。WHICH逻辑关系上应该是指代砍森林，而不是B答案里面的farmland。D答案研究了10分钟，确定没错

mhe2

以下是引用dietywake在2009/8/1 16:03:00的发言：
B答案在语法结构上没问题，但是逻辑关系上错了。WHICH逻辑关系上应该是指代砍森林，而不是B答案里面的farmland。D答案研究了10分钟，确定没错

which为什么不可以指代前面砍伐森林整个分句？非限制性定语从句不是可以这样用的吗？

没办法1987

以下是引用mhe2在2009/8/24 18:13:00的发言：

which为什么不可以指代前面砍伐森林整个分句？非限制性定语从句不是可以这样用的吗？

which不能指代前面整个句子，切记切记。。。

milichen

出题的这帮人还真挺坏的

mars0624

恩。ets太坏了