大家来看看奇怪的GWD-8-Q20

zhushanyi

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 

1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

答案是B，奇怪了WHICH的指代不明吧，IT 也省了，怎么对呢，个人觉得D比较对吧，不清楚，求助NN~~

汲绾

我不是NN，但我觉得D后面那个but用得不对，因为没有需要转折的语气

zhushanyi

那你认为which的指代有错误么？如果有的话，是effectiveness的错误？

aeoluseros

B逻辑都不对了，farmland怎么提供家具了...要提供也是砍伐森林提供。

而且B里面not only... but also...架构了那么长一个句子，不符合书写习惯..

同意楼主，D里面的,but it also形式看到过好几次了。

dianecarton

我觉得这道题没正确答案，非选个的话选A，不过把but it also改成 it but also

aeoluseros

IMO:

A. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also...

除了but it also，还有一个错误...gave既然与create平行，那么应该共享前面的did了，应该用give...

但是D我找不出错误...

dianecarton

有道理，如果把两个句子理解成转折关系，仿佛也能说得通。也只能选D了

Zeldaw

请教一下，not only可以省略吗？

然后A的 gave必需要改成give吗？能不能说did只是针对creat,而gave依然是gave

dianecarton

不懂啊

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-9-11 23:12:23编辑过]

aeoluseros

以下是引用Zeldaw在2008-9-3 13:54:00的发言：

请教一下，not only可以省略吗？

然后A的 gave必需要改成give吗？能不能说did只是针对creat,而gave依然是gave

我觉得D里面不是not only... but also的结构了...只是单纯的转折吧...

还有A的gave改为give我更加准确，倾向于改...要不然遮住前面不看，单看并列成分，读者会奇怪，同时发生的动作怎么就用两个时态了呢...